From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch][rfc] mm: new address space calls
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:52:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1235742767.10511.7.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090227112622.GA13428@wotan.suse.de>
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 12:26 +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 08:21:45AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
> > > > One problem I have with the btrfs extent state code is that I might
> > > > choose to release the extent state in releasepage, but the VM might not
> > > > choose to free the page. So I've got an up to date page without any of
> > > > the rest of my state.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure. What semantics do you want there? In most cases (including
> > > fsblock default case where the filesystem does not have a pin), we're
> > > happy to leave clean, uptodate pages in pagecache in that case.
> >
> > Right, but it really limits the state that we can keep outside the page
> > bits. Take a subpage block, where we know the first 1k is up to date.
> > releasepage comes and we free our tracking that says the first 1k is up
> > to date, but the VM doesn't free the page.
> >
> > Now we have a page where the uptodate bit isn't set, but the first 1k
> > has valid data. We have to reread it.
>
> Well I don't see how that limits us? Either we prefer to keep the
> metadata, or we throw it away and it is inevitable that we lose
> information.
>
We can't have metadata that isn't freed by releasepage unless we want to
pin the page completely. There was a time when the btrfs metadata had a
bit for 'this block needs defrag', and I ended up not being able to use
it because releasepage was consistently freeing my extra data while the
page was still around.
> Regardless of whether you store the data in a tree of extends in the
> inode, or per-page buffers, you have the same problem (buffer heads
> have that same problem too).
>
Right.
>
> > I'd like a form of releasepage that knows if the vm is going to really
> > get rid of the page. Or another callback that happens when the VM is
> > sure the page will be freed so we can drop extra metadata that doesn't
> > pin the page, but we always want to stay with the page.
>
> Well, for page reclaim/invalidate/truncate, we have releasepage that you
> can use even if the metadata is stored outside the page, just set PagePrivate
> and it will still get called when the page is about to be freed.
>
For clean pages, shrink_page_list seems to check the page count after
the releasepage call. It was a big enough window for me to see it in
practice under normal workloads.
> There are *some* races that can result in the page subsequently not being
> freed, but I don't think that should be a big deal. I don't want to add
> a callback in the pagecache remove path if possible, but we can try to
> rework or improve things if btrfs needs something specific..
Btrfs doesn't need it today, but it should help once I finally get
subpage blocks going again (and metadata defrag as well).
-chris
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-27 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-25 10:48 [patch][rfc] mm: new address space calls Nick Piggin
2009-02-25 20:59 ` Chris Mason
2009-02-26 5:17 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-26 13:21 ` Chris Mason
2009-02-27 11:26 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-27 13:52 ` Chris Mason [this message]
2009-02-28 5:52 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-28 23:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-03-01 2:38 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-28 23:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-03-01 2:45 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1235742767.10511.7.camel@think.oraclecorp.com \
--to=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).