From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@free.fr>
Subject: Re: Replacing VFAT as filesystem on removeable media
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:21:37 +0200
Message-ID: <1238512897.27596.579.camel@skunk>
References: <200903311015.29222.Martin@Lichtvoll.de>
	 <200903311357.44075.mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk>
	 <1238507227.27596.559.camel@skunk>
	 <200903311602.41272.mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	info@fsf.org, office@fsfeurope.org, info@linuxfoundation.org
To: Mark Williamson <mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel-3=40m.gmane.org-S1762094AbZCaPW1@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <200903311602.41272.mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 16:02 +0100, Mark Williamson wrote:
> I've not heard of Linux providing an MTP responder ("server"), 
> which I find mildly surprising as it sounds like it would be useful, 
> particularly given the range of advanced filesystems Linux devices might like 
> to leverage under the hood.  It seems odd if an embedded Linux company hasn't 
> already coded this up for a device ... ?

I'm speaking out of my ass here, but seeing how Microsoft managed to
sneak some patents into something as trivial as FAT, I'm pretty sure MTP
is a hell of a minefield.

	Xav