From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] vfs: Call ->sync_fs() even if s_dirt is 0 (version 3)
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:35:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1240522536-2994-3-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1240522536-2994-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz>
sync_filesystems() has a condition that if wait == 0 and s_dirt == 0, then
->sync_fs() isn't called. This does not really make much sence since s_dirt is
generally used by a filesystem to mean that ->write_super() needs to be called.
But ->sync_fs() does different things. I even suspect that some filesystems
(btrfs?) sets s_dirt just to fool this logic.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
fs/super.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
index 4826540..d9759e0 100644
--- a/fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/super.c
@@ -490,7 +490,7 @@ restart:
spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
down_read(&sb->s_umount);
async_synchronize_full_domain(&sb->s_async_list);
- if (sb->s_root && (wait || sb->s_dirt))
+ if (sb->s_root)
sb->s_op->sync_fs(sb, wait);
up_read(&sb->s_umount);
/* restart only when sb is no longer on the list */
--
1.6.0.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-23 21:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-23 21:35 [PATCH 0/4] Fix sys_sync() and cleanup code (version 3) Jan Kara
2009-04-23 21:35 ` [PATCH 1/4] vfs: Fix sys_sync() and fsync_super() reliability " Jan Kara
2009-04-23 21:35 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2009-04-23 21:35 ` [PATCH 3/4] vfs: Make __fsync_super() a static function " Jan Kara
2009-04-23 21:39 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-04-23 21:52 ` Jan Kara
2009-04-23 21:35 ` [PATCH 4/4] vfs: Make sys_sync() use fsync_super() " Jan Kara
2009-04-24 18:13 ` [PATCH 0/4] Fix sys_sync() and cleanup code " Christoph Hellwig
2009-04-26 11:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-04-27 13:27 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1240522536-2994-3-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).