From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust-41N18TsMXrtuMpJDpNschA@public.gmane.org>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Rince <rincebrain-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Andrew Morton
<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: NFS BUG_ON in nfs_do_writepage
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 07:45:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1240919117.7376.6.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090428042717.GA6304-B4tOwbsTzaBolqkO4TVVkw@public.gmane.org>
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 06:27 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 01:55:22PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-04-26 at 17:13 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > This doesn't seem to fix the race, though... on kernels with the
> > > race still there, it will just open a window where you can have
> > > a dirty pte but the page not written out.
> > >
> > > I don't understand.
> >
> > I'm just pointing out that the NFS client already calls
> > __set_page_dirty_nobuffers() while holding the page lock inside the
> > nfs_vm_page_mkwrite() call, so having the VM do it too in the call to
> > set_page_dirty_balance() is actually redundant. IOW: as far as the NFS
> > code is concerned, we can get rid of the ->set_page_dirty() callback in
> > that situation.
> >
> > I couldn't find any other places in the VM code where we can have a
> > dirty pte without also having called page_mkwrite() (and hence
> > __set_page_dirty_nobuffers). As I said, adding a WARN_ON(!PageDirty())
> > in ->set_page_dirty() didn't ever trigger any cases where the
> > set_page_dirty() was actually setting the dirty bit (except in the case
> > where we race with page writeout in do_wp_page() and __do_fault()).
> >
> > That's why I believe disabling ->set_page_dirty() is safe here, and will
> > in fact suffice to fix the page writeout race.
>
> Ah, no I don't think so because it opens another race where the
> pte is dity but the page is marked clean.
So how can that happen?
AFAICS, when the pte is dirtied, we should get a page fault, which
causes the page itself to be marked dirty by the nfs_vm_page_mkwrite()
callback.
When the page gets written out, the VM calls clear_page_dirty_for_io()
which also causes the pte to be cleaned.
At what point can you therefore have a situation where the pte is dirty
without the page being marked as dirty too?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-28 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <alpine.LFD.2.00.0904130145050.4396@centaur.acm.jhu.edu>
[not found] ` <20090412235010.c8e3475b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
[not found] ` <1239650202.16771.15.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
[not found] ` <5da0588e0904131506k5c58e8ddob9bf38f61da6302a@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <5da0588e0904131644g131dc816r61884e83bc4cd006@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <5da0588e0904240226j3454941y5f58c17a32a9a23d@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <1240671428.6112.1.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
[not found] ` <1240671428.6112.1.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-26 6:40 ` NFS BUG_ON in nfs_do_writepage Nick Piggin
2009-04-26 14:18 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-04-26 15:13 ` Nick Piggin
2009-04-26 17:55 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <1240768522.10548.33.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-28 4:27 ` Nick Piggin
[not found] ` <20090428042717.GA6304-B4tOwbsTzaBolqkO4TVVkw@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-28 11:45 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2009-04-28 11:54 ` Nick Piggin
2009-04-28 11:59 ` Trond Myklebust
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1240919117.7376.6.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org \
--to=trond.myklebust-41n18tsmxrtumpjdpnscha@public.gmane.org \
--cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=npiggin-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rincebrain-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).