From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: hch@lst.de, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 09/17] ext3: Remove syncing logic from ext3_file_write
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:59:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1250874001-15483-9-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1250874001-15483-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz>
Syncing is now properly done by generic_file_aio_write() so no special logic is
needed in ext3.
CC: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
fs/ext3/file.c | 61 +-------------------------------------------------------
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext3/file.c b/fs/ext3/file.c
index 5b49704..51fee5f 100644
--- a/fs/ext3/file.c
+++ b/fs/ext3/file.c
@@ -51,71 +51,12 @@ static int ext3_release_file (struct inode * inode, struct file * filp)
return 0;
}
-static ssize_t
-ext3_file_write(struct kiocb *iocb, const struct iovec *iov,
- unsigned long nr_segs, loff_t pos)
-{
- struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
- struct inode *inode = file->f_path.dentry->d_inode;
- ssize_t ret;
- int err;
-
- ret = generic_file_aio_write(iocb, iov, nr_segs, pos);
-
- /*
- * Skip flushing if there was an error, or if nothing was written.
- */
- if (ret <= 0)
- return ret;
-
- /*
- * If the inode is IS_SYNC, or is O_SYNC and we are doing data
- * journalling then we need to make sure that we force the transaction
- * to disk to keep all metadata uptodate synchronously.
- */
- if (file->f_flags & O_SYNC) {
- /*
- * If we are non-data-journaled, then the dirty data has
- * already been flushed to backing store by generic_osync_inode,
- * and the inode has been flushed too if there have been any
- * modifications other than mere timestamp updates.
- *
- * Open question --- do we care about flushing timestamps too
- * if the inode is IS_SYNC?
- */
- if (!ext3_should_journal_data(inode))
- return ret;
-
- goto force_commit;
- }
-
- /*
- * So we know that there has been no forced data flush. If the inode
- * is marked IS_SYNC, we need to force one ourselves.
- */
- if (!IS_SYNC(inode))
- return ret;
-
- /*
- * Open question #2 --- should we force data to disk here too? If we
- * don't, the only impact is that data=writeback filesystems won't
- * flush data to disk automatically on IS_SYNC, only metadata (but
- * historically, that is what ext2 has done.)
- */
-
-force_commit:
- err = ext3_force_commit(inode->i_sb);
- if (err)
- return err;
- return ret;
-}
-
const struct file_operations ext3_file_operations = {
.llseek = generic_file_llseek,
.read = do_sync_read,
.write = do_sync_write,
.aio_read = generic_file_aio_read,
- .aio_write = ext3_file_write,
+ .aio_write = generic_file_aio_write,
.unlocked_ioctl = ext3_ioctl,
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
.compat_ioctl = ext3_compat_ioctl,
--
1.6.0.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-21 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-21 16:59 [PATCH 01/17] vfs: Introduce filemap_fdatawait_range Jan Kara
2009-08-21 16:59 ` [PATCH 02/17] vfs: Export __generic_file_aio_write() and add some comments Jan Kara
2009-08-21 16:59 ` [PATCH 03/17] vfs: Remove syncing from generic_file_direct_write() and generic_file_buffered_write() Jan Kara
2009-08-21 16:59 ` [PATCH 04/17] pohmelfs: Use __generic_file_aio_write instead of generic_file_aio_write_nolock Jan Kara
2009-08-21 16:59 ` [PATCH 05/17] ocfs2: " Jan Kara
2009-08-21 16:59 ` [PATCH 06/17] vfs: Rename generic_file_aio_write_nolock Jan Kara
2009-08-21 16:59 ` [PATCH 07/17] vfs: Introduce new helpers for syncing after writing to O_SYNC file or IS_SYNC inode Jan Kara
2009-08-21 16:59 ` [PATCH 08/17] ext2: Update comment about generic_osync_inode Jan Kara
2009-08-21 16:59 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2009-08-21 16:59 ` [PATCH 10/17] ext4: Remove syncing logic from ext4_file_write Jan Kara
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-08-21 17:23 [PATCH 0/17] Make O_SYNC handling use standard syncing path (Version 2) Jan Kara
2009-08-21 17:23 ` [PATCH 09/17] ext3: Remove syncing logic from ext3_file_write Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1250874001-15483-9-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).