From: Richard Kennedy <richard@rsk.demon.co.uk>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
"chris.mason" <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] v2 mm: balance_dirty_pages. reduce calls to global_page_state to reduce cache references
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 11:11:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1252318290.2348.20.camel@castor> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090906184214.GL18599@kernel.dk>
On Sun, 2009-09-06 at 20:42 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 04 2009, Richard Kennedy wrote:
> > Reducing the number of times balance_dirty_pages calls global_page_state
> > reduces the cache references and so improves write performance on a
> > variety of workloads.
> >
> > 'perf stats' of simple fio write tests shows the reduction in cache
> > access.
> > Where the test is fio 'write,mmap,600Mb,pre_read' on AMD AthlonX2 with
> > 3Gb memory (dirty_threshold approx 600 Mb)
> > running each test 10 times, dropping the fasted & slowest values then
> > taking
> > the average & standard deviation
> >
> > average (s.d.) in millions (10^6)
> > 2.6.31-rc8 648.6 (14.6)
> > +patch 620.1 (16.5)
>
> This patch looks good to me, I have workloads too here where up to 10%
> of the time is spent in balance_dirty_pages() because of this. I'll give
> this patch a go on the box and test in question tomorrow, but it looks
> promising.
>
Thanks Jens,
It will be interesting to see how it works on different hardware &
workload. How many cores are you going to run it on?
wow 10% in balance_dirty_pages! Is that on a large server? or do you
think its peculiar to your workload?
regards
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-07 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-04 11:05 [RFC PATCH] v2 mm: balance_dirty_pages. reduce calls to global_page_state to reduce cache references Richard Kennedy
2009-09-06 3:55 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-07 10:06 ` Richard Kennedy
2009-09-08 10:41 ` Richard Kennedy
2009-09-06 18:42 ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-07 10:11 ` Richard Kennedy [this message]
2009-09-07 10:42 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1252318290.2348.20.camel@castor \
--to=richard@rsk.demon.co.uk \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).