From: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, hch@infradead.org, adilger@sun.com,
yehuda@newdream.net, garlick@llnl.gov, raven@themaw.net,
Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
Subject: [PATCH] vfs: clean up real_lookup
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:11:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1253808660-20473-2-git-send-email-sage@newdream.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1253808660-20473-1-git-send-email-sage@newdream.net>
Get rid of the goto by flipping the if (!result) over. Make the
comments a bit more descriptive. Fix a few kernel style problems.
No functional changes.
CC: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda@newdream.net>
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
---
fs/namei.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
index f74ddb3..6770dde 100644
--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -469,19 +469,20 @@ ok:
* This is called when everything else fails, and we actually have
* to go to the low-level filesystem to find out what we should do..
*
- * We get the directory semaphore, and after getting that we also
+ * We get the directory mutex, and after getting that we also
* make sure that nobody added the entry to the dcache in the meantime..
* SMP-safe
*/
-static struct dentry * real_lookup(struct dentry * parent, struct qstr * name, struct nameidata *nd)
+static struct dentry *real_lookup(struct dentry *parent, struct qstr *name,
+ struct nameidata *nd)
{
- struct dentry * result;
+ struct dentry *result, *dentry;
struct inode *dir = parent->d_inode;
mutex_lock(&dir->i_mutex);
/*
* First re-do the cached lookup just in case it was created
- * while we waited for the directory semaphore..
+ * while we waited for the directory mutex.
*
* FIXME! This could use version numbering or similar to
* avoid unnecessary cache lookups.
@@ -494,38 +495,40 @@ static struct dentry * real_lookup(struct dentry * parent, struct qstr * name, s
* so doing d_lookup() (with seqlock), instead of lockfree __d_lookup
*/
result = d_lookup(parent, name);
- if (!result) {
- struct dentry *dentry;
-
-do_the_lookup:
- /* Don't create child dentry for a dead directory. */
- result = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
- if (IS_DEADDIR(dir))
- goto out_unlock;
-
- dentry = d_alloc(parent, name);
- result = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
- if (dentry) {
- result = dir->i_op->lookup(dir, dentry, nd);
+ if (result) {
+ /*
+ * The cache was re-populated while we waited on the
+ * mutex. We need to revalidate, this time while
+ * holding i_mutex (to avoid another race).
+ */
+ if (result->d_op && result->d_op->d_revalidate) {
+ result = do_revalidate(result, nd);
if (result)
- dput(dentry);
- else
- result = dentry;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ /*
+ * The dentry was left behind invalid. Just
+ * do the lookup.
+ */
+ } else {
+ goto out_unlock;
}
-out_unlock:
- mutex_unlock(&dir->i_mutex);
- return result;
}
- /*
- * Uhhuh! Nasty case: the cache was re-populated while
- * we waited on the semaphore. Need to revalidate.
- */
- if (result->d_op && result->d_op->d_revalidate) {
- result = do_revalidate(result, nd);
- if (!result)
- goto do_the_lookup;
+ /* Don't create child dentry for a dead directory. */
+ result = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
+ if (IS_DEADDIR(dir))
+ goto out_unlock;
+
+ dentry = d_alloc(parent, name);
+ result = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+ if (dentry) {
+ result = dir->i_op->lookup(dir, dentry, nd);
+ if (result)
+ dput(dentry);
+ else
+ result = dentry;
}
+out_unlock:
mutex_unlock(&dir->i_mutex);
return result;
}
--
1.5.6.5
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-24 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-24 16:10 [PATCH] vfs: make real_lookup do dentry revalidation with i_mutex held Sage Weil
2009-09-24 16:11 ` Sage Weil [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1253808660-20473-2-git-send-email-sage@newdream.net \
--to=sage@newdream.net \
--cc=adilger@sun.com \
--cc=garlick@llnl.gov \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=raven@themaw.net \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--cc=yehuda@newdream.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).