From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
To: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Cc: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@oracle.com>,
jim owens <jowens@hp.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>,
samba-technical <samba-technical@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: ext4 - getting at birth time (file create time) and getting/setting nanosecond time stamps and utime
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:59:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1256126392.493.640.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <524f69650910201411j3dc4897bic8a042cb17fcede8@mail.gmail.com>
tis 2009-10-20 klockan 16:11 -0500 skrev Steve French:
> "The function utime() allows specification of time stamps with a
> resolution of 1 second. ... The function utimes() is similar, but the
> times argument allows a reso lution of 1 microsecond for the
> timestamps. " 1 millisecond is not sufficient
But it isn't 1 millisecond, it's granulatity is 1 microsecond (1/1000
millisecond, or 1000 nanoseconds)
utime -> second (time_t), same granularity as old stat(), time() and
friends.
utimes -> microsecond (struct timeval) (1/1000000), same granularity as
gettimeofday() and friends.
utimen -> nanosecond (struct timespec) (1/1000000000), same granularity
as current stat(), clock_gettime() and friends.
Regards
Henrik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-21 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-19 17:17 ext4 - getting at birth time (file create time) and getting/setting nanosecond time stamps and utime Steve French
2009-10-19 18:55 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-10-19 18:58 ` Jeremy Allison
2009-10-19 19:37 ` Steve French
2009-10-19 19:12 ` Zach Brown
2009-10-19 20:49 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-10-19 19:45 ` Steve French
2009-10-19 20:11 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-10-19 22:24 ` Steve French
2009-10-19 23:12 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-10-20 3:31 ` Steve French
2009-10-20 12:44 ` jim owens
2009-10-20 20:33 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-10-20 20:49 ` Steve French
2009-10-20 20:59 ` Sunil Mushran
2009-10-20 21:11 ` Steve French
2009-10-20 21:23 ` Sunil Mushran
2009-10-20 21:37 ` Steve French
2009-10-20 21:49 ` Sunil Mushran
2009-10-20 21:56 ` Steve French
2009-10-20 22:16 ` Sunil Mushran
2009-10-21 23:45 ` Mingming
2009-10-21 11:59 ` Henrik Nordstrom [this message]
2009-10-21 15:36 ` Steve French
2009-10-21 18:56 ` Brad Boyer
2009-10-21 23:03 ` Björn Jacke
2009-10-22 21:50 ` Steve French
2009-10-21 0:44 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-10-21 23:42 ` Mingming
2009-10-20 21:10 ` jim owens
2009-10-20 0:41 ` Mingming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1256126392.493.640.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=henrik@henriknordstrom.net \
--cc=adilger@sun.com \
--cc=jowens@hp.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=samba-technical@lists.samba.org \
--cc=smfrench@gmail.com \
--cc=sunil.mushran@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).