From: Mingming <cmm@us.ibm.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>
Cc: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>, jim owens <jowens@hp.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
samba-technical <samba-technical@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: ext4 - getting at birth time (file create time) and getting/setting nanosecond time stamps and utime
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:42:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1256168559.6404.14.camel@mingming-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0D2A558D-C332-4C82-999A-A29B740C2008@sun.com>
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 18:44 -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On 20-Oct-09, at 14:49, Steve French wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>
> > wrote:
> >> For those users/admins that want to be able to change this (due to
> >> Samba, or whatever), great, we can give them this ability, but for
> >> users who do NOT want regular users to be able to change the file
> >> creation timestamp, that should be possible as well.
> >
> > So, are we ready for Mingming or one of the ext4 developers to propose
> > a patch for this via xattrs (I can do a similar one for cifs).
> > Sounds like various have said:
> >
> > 1) xattrs instead of ioctl
> > 2) get of create time allowed by default, but set of create time
> > limited
>
>
> A wildly untested/uncompiled patch is attached for purposes of
> discussion.
> One issue that I've already come across is if we are storing a raw
> "timespec"
> we will get different xattrs on disk in the fallback case where the on-
> disk
> inodes are not large enough to store the crtime inside the inode.
>
> This version of the patch will fall back to storing the timespec on disk
> in the supplied size/endianness as an xattr, but it definitely needs
> to be
> handled more appropriately (endian/word size). It _would_ be nice to
> store
> a full 64-bit timespec on disk, but given that the in-inode format
> only can
> handle 34 bits of seconds + 30 bits of nanoseconds, it isn't clear
> whether
> the "fallback" should do better than that.
>
Could we transparently convert user provided raw creation time and store
the same format as whose in-inode creation timestamp in the fallback
case? Just to be consistent. User doesn't have to know what type/size of
ext4 inode it is accessing...
> The main question is whether storing a "user.crtime" as an on-disk xattr
> is a desirable fallback, or if this should just fail?
I think it would be nice to have this fallback, just be consistent, that
for all type of ext4 inodes there is a way to set file creation time for
allowed users(whether default 256 bytes large inode which could store
the 34+30bit creation time, or the 128 bytes smaller inode, which
doesn't have space to store the creation in the inode)
Regards,
Mingming
> Similarly, should
> the lack of on-disk crtime return "0.0" as the creation time, or should
> it return -ENODATA or similar?
> Cheers, Andreas
> --
> Andreas Dilger
> Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
> Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-21 23:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-19 17:17 ext4 - getting at birth time (file create time) and getting/setting nanosecond time stamps and utime Steve French
2009-10-19 18:55 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-10-19 18:58 ` Jeremy Allison
2009-10-19 19:37 ` Steve French
2009-10-19 19:12 ` Zach Brown
2009-10-19 20:49 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-10-19 19:45 ` Steve French
2009-10-19 20:11 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-10-19 22:24 ` Steve French
2009-10-19 23:12 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-10-20 3:31 ` Steve French
2009-10-20 12:44 ` jim owens
2009-10-20 20:33 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-10-20 20:49 ` Steve French
2009-10-20 20:59 ` Sunil Mushran
2009-10-20 21:11 ` Steve French
2009-10-20 21:23 ` Sunil Mushran
2009-10-20 21:37 ` Steve French
2009-10-20 21:49 ` Sunil Mushran
2009-10-20 21:56 ` Steve French
2009-10-20 22:16 ` Sunil Mushran
2009-10-21 23:45 ` Mingming
2009-10-21 11:59 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2009-10-21 15:36 ` Steve French
2009-10-21 18:56 ` Brad Boyer
2009-10-21 23:03 ` Björn Jacke
2009-10-22 21:50 ` Steve French
2009-10-21 0:44 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-10-21 23:42 ` Mingming [this message]
2009-10-20 21:10 ` jim owens
2009-10-20 0:41 ` Mingming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1256168559.6404.14.camel@mingming-laptop \
--to=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=adilger@sun.com \
--cc=jowens@hp.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=samba-technical@lists.samba.org \
--cc=smfrench@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).