From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] VM/NFS: The VM must tell the filesystem when to free reclaimable pages Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:30:43 -0500 Message-ID: <1262842243.2185.47.camel@localhost> References: <20100106205110.22547.85345.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20100106205110.22547.81645.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20100107022903.GD9475@localhost> <1262839763.2185.25.camel@localhost> <20100107050307.GA19399@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Jan Kara , Steve Rago , "linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "jens.axboe" , Peter Staubach , Arjan van de Ven , Ingo Molnar , "linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" To: Wu Fengguang Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100107050307.GA19399@localhost> Sender: linux-nfs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 13:03 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > "commit" could also be misread as "commit a transaction"? > Anyway I think adding an "nfs" limits the scope to NFS thus makes code > reading somehow easier. Just a personal feeling. How about 'force_commit_unstable' instead? That ties it up to the unstable writes rather than NFS. Cheers Trond -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html