From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] bitops: compile time optimization for hweight_long(CONSTANT) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:51:50 +0100 Message-ID: <1266490310.26719.185.camel@laptop> References: <4B6C93A2.1090302@zytor.com> <20100206093659.GA28326@aftab> <4B6E1DA3.50204@zytor.com> <20100208092845.GB12618@a1.tnic> <4B6FDAED.9060204@zytor.com> <20100208095945.GA14740@a1.tnic> <20100211172424.GB19779@aftab> <4B743F7D.3090605@zytor.com> <20100212170649.GC3114@aftab> <4B758FC0.1020600@zytor.com> <20100212174751.GD3114@aftab> <4B75A66A.70005@zytor.com> <4B7BF5D6.3030701@suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Borislav Petkov , linux-kbuild , Borislav Petkov , Andrew Morton , Wu Fengguang , LKML , Jamie Lokier , Roland Dreier , Al Viro , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , Ingo Molnar , Brian Gerst To: Michal Marek Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4B7BF5D6.3030701@suse.cz> Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 14:57 +0100, Michal Marek wrote: > On 12.2.2010 20:05, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > On 02/12/2010 09:47 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > >> > >> However, this is generic code and for the above to work we have to > >> enforce x86-specific CFLAGS for it. What is the preferred way to do > >> that? > >> > > > > That's a question for Michal and the kbuild list. Michal? > > (I was offline last week). > > The _preferred_ way probably is not to do it :), but otherwise you can > set CFLAGS_hweight.o depending on CONFIG_X86(_32|_64), just like you do > in arch/x86/lib/Makefile already. I guess one way to achieve that is to create a arch/x86/lib/hweight.c that includes lib/hweight.c and give the x86 one special compile flags and not build the lib on.