From: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>,
Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sys_umount() returns EBUSY when doing: sh -c "mount /dev/sdc1 /mnt; umount /mnt"
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:53:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1268722411.2269.34.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100315163454.GV30031@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 16:34 +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:04:46AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > On 2010-03-13, at 13:30, Francis Moreau wrote:
> > >I've some shell scripts which try to find out the filesystem hosted by
> > >a block device.
> > >
> > >They basically do this:
> > >
> > > mount /dev/sdc1 /mnt
> > > fs=$(stat -f -c %T $mount_point)
> > > umount /mnt
> >
> > Mounting an in-use filesystem is a bad idea.
>
> Huh? mount() will happily create another vfsmount refering to the same
> superblock in that case. It *is* OK to mount the same block device twice;
> any fs that uses get_sb_bdev() will DTRT.
>
> It should be safe. The lack of error checking after mount, OTOH, is not.
I started seeing similar behavior in autofs after the pnode patches went
in. I was never able to decide if I was doing something wrong or if
there had been some latency in reducing reference counts introduced.
Also, I couldn't see anything in the kernel code that that even looked
like it would cause this so I didn't see any use in reporting it.
Instead I began using a retry loop with a short delay when umounting
mounts.
Ian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-16 6:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <38b2ab8a1003130056u4b025839i556a797ccad894de@mail.gmail.com>
2010-03-13 20:30 ` sys_umount() returns EBUSY when doing: sh -c "mount /dev/sdc1 /mnt; umount /mnt" Francis Moreau
2010-03-15 16:04 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-03-15 16:34 ` Al Viro
2010-03-15 20:23 ` Francis Moreau
2010-03-16 6:53 ` Ian Kent [this message]
2010-03-15 20:19 ` Francis Moreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1268722411.2269.34.camel@localhost \
--to=raven@themaw.net \
--cc=adilger@sun.com \
--cc=francis.moro@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).