From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Subrata Modak Subject: Re: [LTP] [Bugme-new] [Bug 15909] New: open("a/", O_NOFOLLOW) fails with ELOOP if "a" is a symbolic link to a directory. Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 01:36:09 +0530 Message-ID: <1274126769.5106.17.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> References: <20100506143002.0381501b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20100511154850.GC2832@quack.suse.cz> <20100511162452.GD2832@quack.suse.cz> <1273595753.4875.1.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> <20100512155948.GD3326@quack.suse.cz> <1273682772.4910.4.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> <20100513112954.GB3252@quack.suse.cz> Reply-To: subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net, tolzmann@molgen.mpg.de, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, Al Viro , bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Christoph Hellwig , chrubis@suse.cz To: Jan Kara Return-path: Received: from e3.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.143]:39694 "EHLO e3.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751560Ab0EQUG2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2010 16:06:28 -0400 Received: from d01relay01.pok.ibm.com (d01relay01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.233]) by e3.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o4HJrZMv010786 for ; Mon, 17 May 2010 15:53:35 -0400 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by d01relay01.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o4HK6R7S177840 for ; Mon, 17 May 2010 16:06:27 -0400 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o4HK6Mc4021209 for ; Mon, 17 May 2010 14:06:23 -0600 In-Reply-To: <20100513112954.GB3252@quack.suse.cz> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 13:29 +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > On Wed 12-05-10 22:16:03, Subrata Modak wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 17:59 +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Tue 11-05-10 22:05:52, Subrata Modak wrote: > > > > It would be great if you can shoot it in the form of a patch, mentioning > > > > > > > > 1. The GPL Lincense, > > > > 2. The purpose of the test case, > > > > 3. Exact location it goes, > > > > 4. Which LTPROOT/runtest/ executes it > > > With a help of Cyril I've created the attached patch and verified that > > > the test fails on 2.6.33 but succeeds on 2.6.32... > > > > Great. Thanks for the patch. But, it falters on the latest git. Can you > > please rebase and resend: > Ah, OK. Sorry for that. Now a patch rediffed against latest git tree of > LTP. Hopefully this time I got it right. Thanks. Regards-- Subrata > > Honza