* [PATCH 2/2] fs: optimize mpage_bio_submit()
@ 2010-05-29 1:19 Changli Gao
2010-05-29 12:47 ` Borislav Petkov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Changli Gao @ 2010-05-29 1:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Viro; +Cc: linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel, Changli Gao
optimize mpage_bio_submit()
check rw, then initialize bio->bi_end_io.
Signed-off-by: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>
----
fs/mpage.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/mpage.c b/fs/mpage.c
index 94ff0d1..632681c 100644
--- a/fs/mpage.c
+++ b/fs/mpage.c
@@ -85,9 +85,7 @@ static void mpage_end_io_write(struct bio *bio, int err)
static struct bio *mpage_bio_submit(int rw, struct bio *bio)
{
- bio->bi_end_io = mpage_end_io_read;
- if (rw == WRITE)
- bio->bi_end_io = mpage_end_io_write;
+ bio->bi_end_io = rw != WRITE ? mpage_end_io_read : mpage_end_io_write;
submit_bio(rw, bio);
return NULL;
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] fs: optimize mpage_bio_submit()
2010-05-29 1:19 [PATCH 2/2] fs: optimize mpage_bio_submit() Changli Gao
@ 2010-05-29 12:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-05-29 13:33 ` Changli Gao
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Borislav Petkov @ 2010-05-29 12:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Changli Gao; +Cc: Alexander Viro, linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel
From: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, May 29, 2010 at 09:19:26AM +0800
> optimize mpage_bio_submit()
>
> check rw, then initialize bio->bi_end_io.
>
> Signed-off-by: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>
> ----
> fs/mpage.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/fs/mpage.c b/fs/mpage.c
> index 94ff0d1..632681c 100644
> --- a/fs/mpage.c
> +++ b/fs/mpage.c
> @@ -85,9 +85,7 @@ static void mpage_end_io_write(struct bio *bio, int err)
>
> static struct bio *mpage_bio_submit(int rw, struct bio *bio)
> {
> - bio->bi_end_io = mpage_end_io_read;
> - if (rw == WRITE)
> - bio->bi_end_io = mpage_end_io_write;
> + bio->bi_end_io = rw != WRITE ? mpage_end_io_read : mpage_end_io_write;
> submit_bio(rw, bio);
> return NULL;
ok, can you sincerely tell me that your change makes the code more
readable? And have you checked to see what the compiler actually
"optimizes"?
original code:
movq $mpage_end_io_read, %rdx #, tmp65
movq $mpage_end_io_write, %rax #, tmp64
cmpl $1, %edi #, rw
cmovne %rdx, %rax # tmp65,, tmp64
movq %rax, 80(%rsi) # tmp64, <variable>.bi_end_io
.loc 1 91 0
call submit_bio #
your change:
movq $mpage_end_io_read, %rdx #, tmp63
movq $mpage_end_io_write, %rax #, iftmp.561
cmpl $1, %edi #, rw
cmovne %rdx, %rax # tmp63,, iftmp.561
movq %rax, 80(%rsi) # iftmp.561, <variable>.bi_end_io
.loc 1 90 0
call submit_bio #
so that change does nothing except obfuscating the source a bit more so
that you get more headaches whenever you look at it.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] fs: optimize mpage_bio_submit()
2010-05-29 12:47 ` Borislav Petkov
@ 2010-05-29 13:33 ` Changli Gao
2010-05-29 13:43 ` Borislav Petkov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Changli Gao @ 2010-05-29 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Borislav Petkov, Changli Gao, Alexander Viro, linux-fsdevel,
linux-kernel
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
>
> ok, can you sincerely tell me that your change makes the code more
> readable? And have you checked to see what the compiler actually
> "optimizes"?
>
> original code:
>
> movq $mpage_end_io_read, %rdx #, tmp65
> movq $mpage_end_io_write, %rax #, tmp64
> cmpl $1, %edi #, rw
> cmovne %rdx, %rax # tmp65,, tmp64
> movq %rax, 80(%rsi) # tmp64, <variable>.bi_end_io
> .loc 1 91 0
> call submit_bio #
>
> your change:
>
> movq $mpage_end_io_read, %rdx #, tmp63
> movq $mpage_end_io_write, %rax #, iftmp.561
> cmpl $1, %edi #, rw
> cmovne %rdx, %rax # tmp63,, iftmp.561
> movq %rax, 80(%rsi) # iftmp.561, <variable>.bi_end_io
> .loc 1 90 0
> call submit_bio #
>
> so that change does nothing except obfuscating the source a bit more so
> that you get more headaches whenever you look at it.
>
Oh, I didn't check the asm code. Compiler is smarter than I thought.
Thanks for your explaining.
--
Regards,
Changli Gao(xiaosuo@gmail.com)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] fs: optimize mpage_bio_submit()
2010-05-29 13:33 ` Changli Gao
@ 2010-05-29 13:43 ` Borislav Petkov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Borislav Petkov @ 2010-05-29 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Changli Gao; +Cc: Alexander Viro, linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel
From: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, May 29, 2010 at 09:33:02PM +0800
> Compiler is smarter than I thought.
Not as much as we would like to though :)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-05-29 13:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-05-29 1:19 [PATCH 2/2] fs: optimize mpage_bio_submit() Changli Gao
2010-05-29 12:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-05-29 13:33 ` Changli Gao
2010-05-29 13:43 ` Borislav Petkov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).