* [PATCH 2/2] fs: optimize mpage_bio_submit() @ 2010-05-29 1:19 Changli Gao 2010-05-29 12:47 ` Borislav Petkov 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Changli Gao @ 2010-05-29 1:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexander Viro; +Cc: linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel, Changli Gao optimize mpage_bio_submit() check rw, then initialize bio->bi_end_io. Signed-off-by: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com> ---- fs/mpage.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/mpage.c b/fs/mpage.c index 94ff0d1..632681c 100644 --- a/fs/mpage.c +++ b/fs/mpage.c @@ -85,9 +85,7 @@ static void mpage_end_io_write(struct bio *bio, int err) static struct bio *mpage_bio_submit(int rw, struct bio *bio) { - bio->bi_end_io = mpage_end_io_read; - if (rw == WRITE) - bio->bi_end_io = mpage_end_io_write; + bio->bi_end_io = rw != WRITE ? mpage_end_io_read : mpage_end_io_write; submit_bio(rw, bio); return NULL; } ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] fs: optimize mpage_bio_submit() 2010-05-29 1:19 [PATCH 2/2] fs: optimize mpage_bio_submit() Changli Gao @ 2010-05-29 12:47 ` Borislav Petkov 2010-05-29 13:33 ` Changli Gao 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Borislav Petkov @ 2010-05-29 12:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Changli Gao; +Cc: Alexander Viro, linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel From: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com> Date: Sat, May 29, 2010 at 09:19:26AM +0800 > optimize mpage_bio_submit() > > check rw, then initialize bio->bi_end_io. > > Signed-off-by: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com> > ---- > fs/mpage.c | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > diff --git a/fs/mpage.c b/fs/mpage.c > index 94ff0d1..632681c 100644 > --- a/fs/mpage.c > +++ b/fs/mpage.c > @@ -85,9 +85,7 @@ static void mpage_end_io_write(struct bio *bio, int err) > > static struct bio *mpage_bio_submit(int rw, struct bio *bio) > { > - bio->bi_end_io = mpage_end_io_read; > - if (rw == WRITE) > - bio->bi_end_io = mpage_end_io_write; > + bio->bi_end_io = rw != WRITE ? mpage_end_io_read : mpage_end_io_write; > submit_bio(rw, bio); > return NULL; ok, can you sincerely tell me that your change makes the code more readable? And have you checked to see what the compiler actually "optimizes"? original code: movq $mpage_end_io_read, %rdx #, tmp65 movq $mpage_end_io_write, %rax #, tmp64 cmpl $1, %edi #, rw cmovne %rdx, %rax # tmp65,, tmp64 movq %rax, 80(%rsi) # tmp64, <variable>.bi_end_io .loc 1 91 0 call submit_bio # your change: movq $mpage_end_io_read, %rdx #, tmp63 movq $mpage_end_io_write, %rax #, iftmp.561 cmpl $1, %edi #, rw cmovne %rdx, %rax # tmp63,, iftmp.561 movq %rax, 80(%rsi) # iftmp.561, <variable>.bi_end_io .loc 1 90 0 call submit_bio # so that change does nothing except obfuscating the source a bit more so that you get more headaches whenever you look at it. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] fs: optimize mpage_bio_submit() 2010-05-29 12:47 ` Borislav Petkov @ 2010-05-29 13:33 ` Changli Gao 2010-05-29 13:43 ` Borislav Petkov 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Changli Gao @ 2010-05-29 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Borislav Petkov, Changli Gao, Alexander Viro, linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote: > > ok, can you sincerely tell me that your change makes the code more > readable? And have you checked to see what the compiler actually > "optimizes"? > > original code: > > movq $mpage_end_io_read, %rdx #, tmp65 > movq $mpage_end_io_write, %rax #, tmp64 > cmpl $1, %edi #, rw > cmovne %rdx, %rax # tmp65,, tmp64 > movq %rax, 80(%rsi) # tmp64, <variable>.bi_end_io > .loc 1 91 0 > call submit_bio # > > your change: > > movq $mpage_end_io_read, %rdx #, tmp63 > movq $mpage_end_io_write, %rax #, iftmp.561 > cmpl $1, %edi #, rw > cmovne %rdx, %rax # tmp63,, iftmp.561 > movq %rax, 80(%rsi) # iftmp.561, <variable>.bi_end_io > .loc 1 90 0 > call submit_bio # > > so that change does nothing except obfuscating the source a bit more so > that you get more headaches whenever you look at it. > Oh, I didn't check the asm code. Compiler is smarter than I thought. Thanks for your explaining. -- Regards, Changli Gao(xiaosuo@gmail.com) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] fs: optimize mpage_bio_submit() 2010-05-29 13:33 ` Changli Gao @ 2010-05-29 13:43 ` Borislav Petkov 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Borislav Petkov @ 2010-05-29 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Changli Gao; +Cc: Alexander Viro, linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel From: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com> Date: Sat, May 29, 2010 at 09:33:02PM +0800 > Compiler is smarter than I thought. Not as much as we would like to though :) -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-05-29 13:43 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2010-05-29 1:19 [PATCH 2/2] fs: optimize mpage_bio_submit() Changli Gao 2010-05-29 12:47 ` Borislav Petkov 2010-05-29 13:33 ` Changli Gao 2010-05-29 13:43 ` Borislav Petkov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).