From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [patch v2] fcntl: return -EFAULT if copy_to_user fails Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 15:42:43 +0200 Message-ID: <1275572563.2456.37.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <20100603100402.GR5483@bicker> <4C07826A.6060302@oss.ntt.co.jp> <20100603103542.GV5483@bicker> <4C07990A.8080508@fusionio.com> <4C079D34.5010500@oss.ntt.co.jp> <1275568683.2456.33.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20100603131031.GM6822@laptop> <4C07AD0C.8090409@oss.ntt.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Nick Piggin , Jens Axboe , Dan Carpenter , Matthew Wilcox , Alexander Viro , Andrew Morton , Oleg Nesterov , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Peter Zijlstra , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Takuya Yoshikawa Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4C07AD0C.8090409@oss.ntt.co.jp> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Le jeudi 03 juin 2010 =C3=A0 22:24 +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa a =C3=A9crit= : > (2010/06/03 22:10), Nick Piggin wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 02:38:03PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: > >> This is really ugly. > >> > >> static inline int sec_copy_to_user(arg1, arg2, arg3) > >> { > >> int res =3D copy_to_user(arg1, arg2, arg3); > >> > >> return (res> 0) ? -EFAULT : res; > >> } > > > > It would be unfortunate if it adds more confusion. I'd prefer to ha= ve > > a sufficiently different name. memcpy_to_user/memcpy_from_user > > perhaps? >=20 > Then, and memclear_user() ? >=20 > > >=20 We are interested by the fact that full copy is done, so maybe use the 'full' prefix ? fullcopy_to_user() , fullclear_user() ?