* [PATCH 1/4] ext2: update ctime when changing the file's permission by setfacl
2010-06-04 15:07 [PATCH 0/4] Update ctime when changing the file's permission by setfacl Jan Kara
@ 2010-06-04 15:07 ` Jan Kara
2010-06-04 15:07 ` [PATCH 2/4] vfs: " Jan Kara
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2010-06-04 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-fsdevel
Cc: David Woodhouse, Al Viro, Theodore Ts'o, linux-ext4, Jan Kara
ext2 didn't update the ctime of the file when its permission was changed.
Steps to reproduce:
# touch aaa
# stat -c %Z aaa
1275289822
# setfacl -m 'u::x,g::x,o::x' aaa
# stat -c %Z aaa
1275289822 <- unchanged
But, according to the spec of the ctime, ext2 must update it.
Port of ext3 patch by Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>.
CC: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
fs/ext2/acl.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext2/acl.c b/fs/ext2/acl.c
index ca7e2a0..2bcc043 100644
--- a/fs/ext2/acl.c
+++ b/fs/ext2/acl.c
@@ -200,6 +200,7 @@ ext2_set_acl(struct inode *inode, int type, struct posix_acl *acl)
return error;
else {
inode->i_mode = mode;
+ inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME_SEC;
mark_inode_dirty(inode);
if (error == 0)
acl = NULL;
--
1.6.4.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/4] vfs: update ctime when changing the file's permission by setfacl
2010-06-04 15:07 [PATCH 0/4] Update ctime when changing the file's permission by setfacl Jan Kara
2010-06-04 15:07 ` [PATCH 1/4] ext2: update " Jan Kara
@ 2010-06-04 15:07 ` Jan Kara
2010-06-04 15:07 ` [PATCH 3/4] ext4: " Jan Kara
2010-06-04 15:07 ` [PATCH 4/4] jffs2: " Jan Kara
3 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2010-06-04 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-fsdevel
Cc: David Woodhouse, Al Viro, Theodore Ts'o, linux-ext4, Jan Kara
generic_acl_set didn't update the ctime of the file when its permission was
changed.
Steps to reproduce:
# touch aaa
# stat -c %Z aaa
1275289822
# setfacl -m 'u::x,g::x,o::x' aaa
# stat -c %Z aaa
1275289822 <- unchanged
But, according to the spec of the ctime, vfs must update it.
Port of ext3 patch by Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>.
CC: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
fs/generic_acl.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/generic_acl.c b/fs/generic_acl.c
index 99800e5..6bc9e3a 100644
--- a/fs/generic_acl.c
+++ b/fs/generic_acl.c
@@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ generic_acl_set(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name, const void *value,
if (error < 0)
goto failed;
inode->i_mode = mode;
+ inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME;
if (error == 0) {
posix_acl_release(acl);
acl = NULL;
--
1.6.4.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/4] ext4: update ctime when changing the file's permission by setfacl
2010-06-04 15:07 [PATCH 0/4] Update ctime when changing the file's permission by setfacl Jan Kara
2010-06-04 15:07 ` [PATCH 1/4] ext2: update " Jan Kara
2010-06-04 15:07 ` [PATCH 2/4] vfs: " Jan Kara
@ 2010-06-04 15:07 ` Jan Kara
2010-06-15 16:21 ` tytso
2010-06-04 15:07 ` [PATCH 4/4] jffs2: " Jan Kara
3 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2010-06-04 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-fsdevel
Cc: David Woodhouse, Al Viro, Theodore Ts'o, linux-ext4, Jan Kara
ext4 didn't update the ctime of the file when its permission was changed.
Steps to reproduce:
# touch aaa
# stat -c %Z aaa
1275289822
# setfacl -m 'u::x,g::x,o::x' aaa
# stat -c %Z aaa
1275289822 <- unchanged
But, according to the spec of the ctime, ext4 must update it.
Port of ext3 patch by Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>.
CC: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
CC: tytso@mit.edu
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
fs/ext4/acl.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/acl.c b/fs/ext4/acl.c
index feaf498..5e2ed45 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/acl.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/acl.c
@@ -204,6 +204,7 @@ ext4_set_acl(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, int type,
return error;
else {
inode->i_mode = mode;
+ inode->i_ctime = ext4_current_time(inode);
ext4_mark_inode_dirty(handle, inode);
if (error == 0)
acl = NULL;
--
1.6.4.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] jffs2: update ctime when changing the file's permission by setfacl
2010-06-04 15:07 [PATCH 0/4] Update ctime when changing the file's permission by setfacl Jan Kara
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-04 15:07 ` [PATCH 3/4] ext4: " Jan Kara
@ 2010-06-04 15:07 ` Jan Kara
2010-06-04 15:14 ` David Woodhouse
3 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2010-06-04 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-fsdevel
Cc: David Woodhouse, Al Viro, Theodore Ts'o, linux-ext4, Jan Kara
jffs2 didn't update the ctime of the file when its permission was changed.
Steps to reproduce:
# touch aaa
# stat -c %Z aaa
1275289822
# setfacl -m 'u::x,g::x,o::x' aaa
# stat -c %Z aaa
1275289822 <- unchanged
But, according to the spec of the ctime, jffs2 must update it.
Port of ext3 patch by Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>.
CC: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
fs/jffs2/acl.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/jffs2/acl.c b/fs/jffs2/acl.c
index a33aab6..54a92fd 100644
--- a/fs/jffs2/acl.c
+++ b/fs/jffs2/acl.c
@@ -234,8 +234,9 @@ static int jffs2_set_acl(struct inode *inode, int type, struct posix_acl *acl)
if (inode->i_mode != mode) {
struct iattr attr;
- attr.ia_valid = ATTR_MODE;
+ attr.ia_valid = ATTR_MODE | ATTR_CTIME;
attr.ia_mode = mode;
+ attr.ia_ctime = CURRENT_TIME_SEC;
rc = jffs2_do_setattr(inode, &attr);
if (rc < 0)
return rc;
--
1.6.4.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/4] jffs2: update ctime when changing the file's permission by setfacl
2010-06-04 15:07 ` [PATCH 4/4] jffs2: " Jan Kara
@ 2010-06-04 15:14 ` David Woodhouse
2010-06-04 18:32 ` Al Viro
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: David Woodhouse @ 2010-06-04 15:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Kara; +Cc: linux-fsdevel, Al Viro, Theodore Ts'o, linux-ext4
On Fri, 2010-06-04 at 17:07 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> jffs2 didn't update the ctime of the file when its permission was changed.
Thanks. I have a couple more JFFS2 bug fixes that Al pointed out a day
or two ago, which I want to submit for 2.6.35; I'll merge this through
my tree with those if that's OK.
--
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@intel.com Intel Corporation
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/4] jffs2: update ctime when changing the file's permission by setfacl
2010-06-04 15:14 ` David Woodhouse
@ 2010-06-04 18:32 ` Al Viro
2010-06-04 18:37 ` Al Viro
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Al Viro @ 2010-06-04 18:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Woodhouse; +Cc: Jan Kara, linux-fsdevel, Theodore Ts'o, linux-ext4
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 04:14:02PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-06-04 at 17:07 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > jffs2 didn't update the ctime of the file when its permission was changed.
>
> Thanks. I have a couple more JFFS2 bug fixes that Al pointed out a day
> or two ago, which I want to submit for 2.6.35; I'll merge this through
> my tree with those if that's OK.
How much else is currently in your tree? I'm going to push to Linus in
a bit and I'd simply pull your tree first if that's all there is...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/4] jffs2: update ctime when changing the file's permission by setfacl
2010-06-04 18:32 ` Al Viro
@ 2010-06-04 18:37 ` Al Viro
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Al Viro @ 2010-06-04 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Woodhouse; +Cc: Jan Kara, linux-fsdevel, Theodore Ts'o, linux-ext4
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 07:32:46PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 04:14:02PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-06-04 at 17:07 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > jffs2 didn't update the ctime of the file when its permission was changed.
> >
> > Thanks. I have a couple more JFFS2 bug fixes that Al pointed out a day
> > or two ago, which I want to submit for 2.6.35; I'll merge this through
> > my tree with those if that's OK.
>
> How much else is currently in your tree? I'm going to push to Linus in
> a bit and I'd simply pull your tree first if that's all there is...
Hmm... several mtd patches too... ;-/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread