From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
Subject: [PATCHv5 04/16] VFS: add memory barrier to sb_mark_clean and sb_mark_dirty
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 17:50:17 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1275835829-1478-5-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1275835829-1478-1-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com>
From: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
The proper way for file-systems to synchronize the superblock
should be as follows:
1. when modifying the SB, first modify it, then mark it as dirty;
2. when synchronizing the SB, first mark as clean, then start
synchronizing.
And to make ensure the order, we need memory barriers in 'sb_mark_clean()'
and 'sb_mark_dirty()'.
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
---
include/linux/fs.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
mm/backing-dev.c | 5 +++++
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index ca1e993..3acaccf 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -1783,10 +1783,24 @@ extern int get_sb_pseudo(struct file_system_type *, char *,
struct vfsmount *mnt);
extern void simple_set_mnt(struct vfsmount *mnt, struct super_block *sb);
+/*
+ * The SB clean/dirty state manipulations should be done as follows:
+ * 1. modification: first modify the SB-related data, then mark the SB as
+ * dirty;
+ * 2. synchronization: first mark the SB as clean, then start synchronizing it.
+ *
+ * This order makes sure that races are harmless and we never end up in a
+ * situation when the SB is modified but is nevertheless marked as clean.
+ */
void sb_mark_dirty(struct super_block *sb);
static inline void sb_mark_clean(struct super_block *sb)
{
sb->s_dirty = 0;
+ /*
+ * Normally FSes first unset the sb->s_dirty flag, and then start
+ * synchronizing the SB. The memory barrier ensures this order.
+ */
+ smp_mb();
}
static inline int sb_is_dirty(struct super_block *sb)
{
diff --git a/mm/backing-dev.c b/mm/backing-dev.c
index d751284..d861bd4 100644
--- a/mm/backing-dev.c
+++ b/mm/backing-dev.c
@@ -352,6 +352,11 @@ static void bdi_flush_io(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
void sb_mark_dirty(struct super_block *sb)
{
+ /*
+ * Normally FSes modify the SB, and then mark it as dirty. The memory
+ * barrier ensures this order.
+ */
+ smp_mb();
sb->s_dirty = 1;
/*
* sb->s_dirty store must be visible to sync_supers before we load
--
1.7.0.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-06 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-06 14:50 [PATCHv5 00/16] kill unnecessary SB sync wake-ups + cleanups Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-06 14:50 ` [PATCHv5 01/16] VFS: introduce helpers for the s_dirt flag Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-06 14:50 ` [PATCHv5 02/16] VFS: rename s_dirt to s_dirty Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-06 14:50 ` [PATCHv5 03/16] writeback: lessen sync_supers wakeup count Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-06 14:50 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2010-06-06 17:16 ` [PATCHv5 04/16] VFS: add memory barrier to sb_mark_clean and sb_mark_dirty Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-06 19:22 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-09 16:36 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-06 14:50 ` [PATCHv5 05/16] AFFS: clean up dirty flag usage Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-06 14:50 ` [PATCHv5 06/16] AFFS: wait for sb synchronization when needed Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-06 14:50 ` [PATCHv5 07/16] AFFS: fix race condition in marking SB dirty Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-06 14:50 ` [PATCHv5 08/16] BFS: clean up the superblock usage Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-06 14:50 ` [PATCHv5 09/16] btrfs: remove junk sb_mark_dirty call Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-12 7:36 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-06 14:50 ` [PATCHv5 10/16] exofs: fix race condition in marking SB dirty Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-06 16:12 ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-06-06 14:50 ` [PATCHv5 11/16] ext2: " Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-06 14:50 ` [PATCHv5 12/16] ext4: " Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-06 14:50 ` [PATCHv5 13/16] HFS: " Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-06 14:50 ` [PATCHv5 14/16] HFS: kill hfs_buffer_sync Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-06 14:50 ` [PATCHv5 15/16] HFS: wait for sb synchronization when needed Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-06 14:50 ` [PATCHv5 16/16] HFSPLUS: wait for synchronization Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1275835829-1478-5-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com \
--to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).