From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
Subject: [PATCHv5 08/16] BFS: clean up the superblock usage
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 17:50:21 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1275835829-1478-9-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1275835829-1478-1-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com>
From: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
BFS superblocks contains only static information and is never
changed. However, the BFS code for some misterious reasons
marked its buffer head as dirty from time to time, but nothing
in that buffer was ever changed.
This patch removes all the BFS superblock manipulation, simply
because it is not needed. It removes:
1. The si_sbh filed from 'struct bfs_sb_info' because it is not needed.
We only need to read the SB once on mount to get the start of
data blocks and the FS size. After this, we can forget about the
SB.
2. All instances of 'mark_buffer_dirty()' because the SB is never
changed.
3. The ->sync_fs method because there is nothing to sync except the
inodes, which are synched by VFS.
4. The ->write_super method because the SB is never changed.
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
---
fs/bfs/bfs.h | 1 -
fs/bfs/file.c | 3 ---
fs/bfs/inode.c | 46 +++++++---------------------------------------
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/bfs/bfs.h b/fs/bfs/bfs.h
index 7109e45..f7f87e2 100644
--- a/fs/bfs/bfs.h
+++ b/fs/bfs/bfs.h
@@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ struct bfs_sb_info {
unsigned long si_lf_eblk;
unsigned long si_lasti;
unsigned long *si_imap;
- struct buffer_head *si_sbh; /* buffer header w/superblock */
struct mutex bfs_lock;
};
diff --git a/fs/bfs/file.c b/fs/bfs/file.c
index 88b9a3f..5c8ffce 100644
--- a/fs/bfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/bfs/file.c
@@ -70,7 +70,6 @@ static int bfs_get_block(struct inode *inode, sector_t block,
struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
struct bfs_sb_info *info = BFS_SB(sb);
struct bfs_inode_info *bi = BFS_I(inode);
- struct buffer_head *sbh = info->si_sbh;
phys = bi->i_sblock + block;
if (!create) {
@@ -112,7 +111,6 @@ static int bfs_get_block(struct inode *inode, sector_t block,
info->si_freeb -= phys - bi->i_eblock;
info->si_lf_eblk = bi->i_eblock = phys;
mark_inode_dirty(inode);
- mark_buffer_dirty(sbh);
err = 0;
goto out;
}
@@ -147,7 +145,6 @@ static int bfs_get_block(struct inode *inode, sector_t block,
*/
info->si_freeb -= bi->i_eblock - bi->i_sblock + 1 - inode->i_blocks;
mark_inode_dirty(inode);
- mark_buffer_dirty(sbh);
map_bh(bh_result, sb, phys);
out:
mutex_unlock(&info->bfs_lock);
diff --git a/fs/bfs/inode.c b/fs/bfs/inode.c
index f59220b..fe152dd 100644
--- a/fs/bfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/bfs/inode.c
@@ -31,7 +31,6 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
#define dprintf(x...)
#endif
-static void bfs_write_super(struct super_block *s);
void dump_imap(const char *prefix, struct super_block *s);
struct inode *bfs_iget(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino)
@@ -209,34 +208,12 @@ static void bfs_delete_inode(struct inode *inode)
* "last block of the last file" even if there is no
* real file there, saves us 1 gap.
*/
- if (info->si_lf_eblk == bi->i_eblock) {
+ if (info->si_lf_eblk == bi->i_eblock)
info->si_lf_eblk = bi->i_sblock - 1;
- mark_buffer_dirty(info->si_sbh);
- }
mutex_unlock(&info->bfs_lock);
clear_inode(inode);
}
-static int bfs_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
-{
- struct bfs_sb_info *info = BFS_SB(sb);
-
- mutex_lock(&info->bfs_lock);
- mark_buffer_dirty(info->si_sbh);
- sb_mark_clean(sb);
- mutex_unlock(&info->bfs_lock);
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-static void bfs_write_super(struct super_block *sb)
-{
- if (!(sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY))
- bfs_sync_fs(sb, 1);
- else
- sb_mark_clean(sb);
-}
-
static void bfs_put_super(struct super_block *s)
{
struct bfs_sb_info *info = BFS_SB(s);
@@ -246,10 +223,6 @@ static void bfs_put_super(struct super_block *s)
lock_kernel();
- if (sb_is_dirty(s))
- bfs_write_super(s);
-
- brelse(info->si_sbh);
mutex_destroy(&info->bfs_lock);
kfree(info->si_imap);
kfree(info);
@@ -321,8 +294,6 @@ static const struct super_operations bfs_sops = {
.write_inode = bfs_write_inode,
.delete_inode = bfs_delete_inode,
.put_super = bfs_put_super,
- .write_super = bfs_write_super,
- .sync_fs = bfs_sync_fs,
.statfs = bfs_statfs,
};
@@ -349,7 +320,7 @@ void dump_imap(const char *prefix, struct super_block *s)
static int bfs_fill_super(struct super_block *s, void *data, int silent)
{
- struct buffer_head *bh;
+ struct buffer_head *bh, *sbh;
struct bfs_super_block *bfs_sb;
struct inode *inode;
unsigned i, imap_len;
@@ -365,10 +336,10 @@ static int bfs_fill_super(struct super_block *s, void *data, int silent)
sb_set_blocksize(s, BFS_BSIZE);
- info->si_sbh = sb_bread(s, 0);
- if (!info->si_sbh)
+ sbh = sb_bread(s, 0);
+ if (!sbh)
goto out;
- bfs_sb = (struct bfs_super_block *)info->si_sbh->b_data;
+ bfs_sb = (struct bfs_super_block *)sbh->b_data;
if (le32_to_cpu(bfs_sb->s_magic) != BFS_MAGIC) {
if (!silent)
printf("No BFS filesystem on %s (magic=%08x)\n",
@@ -472,10 +443,7 @@ static int bfs_fill_super(struct super_block *s, void *data, int silent)
info->si_lf_eblk = eblock;
}
brelse(bh);
- if (!(s->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)) {
- mark_buffer_dirty(info->si_sbh);
- sb_mark_dirty(s);
- }
+ brelse(sbh);
dump_imap("read_super", s);
return 0;
@@ -485,7 +453,7 @@ out3:
out2:
kfree(info->si_imap);
out1:
- brelse(info->si_sbh);
+ brelse(sbh);
out:
mutex_destroy(&info->bfs_lock);
kfree(info);
--
1.7.0.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-06 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-06 14:50 [PATCHv5 00/16] kill unnecessary SB sync wake-ups + cleanups Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-06 14:50 ` [PATCHv5 01/16] VFS: introduce helpers for the s_dirt flag Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-06 14:50 ` [PATCHv5 02/16] VFS: rename s_dirt to s_dirty Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-06 14:50 ` [PATCHv5 03/16] writeback: lessen sync_supers wakeup count Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-06 14:50 ` [PATCHv5 04/16] VFS: add memory barrier to sb_mark_clean and sb_mark_dirty Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-06 17:16 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-06 19:22 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-09 16:36 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-06 14:50 ` [PATCHv5 05/16] AFFS: clean up dirty flag usage Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-06 14:50 ` [PATCHv5 06/16] AFFS: wait for sb synchronization when needed Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-06 14:50 ` [PATCHv5 07/16] AFFS: fix race condition in marking SB dirty Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-06 14:50 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2010-06-06 14:50 ` [PATCHv5 09/16] btrfs: remove junk sb_mark_dirty call Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-12 7:36 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-06 14:50 ` [PATCHv5 10/16] exofs: fix race condition in marking SB dirty Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-06 16:12 ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-06-06 14:50 ` [PATCHv5 11/16] ext2: " Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-06 14:50 ` [PATCHv5 12/16] ext4: " Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-06 14:50 ` [PATCHv5 13/16] HFS: " Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-06 14:50 ` [PATCHv5 14/16] HFS: kill hfs_buffer_sync Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-06 14:50 ` [PATCHv5 15/16] HFS: wait for sb synchronization when needed Artem Bityutskiy
2010-06-06 14:50 ` [PATCHv5 16/16] HFSPLUS: wait for synchronization Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1275835829-1478-9-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com \
--to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).