From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk,
josef@redhat.com, jeffmerkey@gmail.com
Subject: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] fsfreeze: fix sb vs bdev freeze/thaw b0rkage
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:19:49 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1276154395-24766-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> (raw)
The following series is for to address bugs in the emergency thawing code, as
well as mismatcheѕ with freezing at the block layer and the superblock that
break the freeze/thaw nesting order.
The first two patches fix the emergency thaw infinite loop reported by Jeff
Merkey and the deadlock on sb->s_umount that the infinite loop hid. These may
be stable kernel candidates.
The remainder of the patches address the bdev/sb mismatch and the fact that sb
level freezing does not nest correctly. For all the places that the bdev
interfaces are used, we need a superblock anyway so we may as well make
freeze/thaw work only at the sb level. As such, this series moves all the
nesting code to the sb from the bdev level and removes the
freeze_bdev/thaw_bdev interfaces completely. It also converts the emergency
thaw to work at the superblock level such that it will now thaw manually frozen
filesystems.
A *big* outstanding problem still exists - freezing takes an active reference
to the superblock, so unmounting an frozen filesystem has some nasty and
unexpected side effects. The existing code results in an unmountable block
device:
# mount /dev/vda /mnt/test
# xfs_freeze -f /mnt/test
# umount /mnt/test
# grep test /proc/mounts
# mkfs.xfs -f -l size=128m /dev/vda
mkfs.xfs: /dev/vda contains a mounted filesystem
Usage: mkfs.xfs
....
# mount /dev/vda /mnt/test
mount: /dev/vda already mounted or /mnt/test busy
#
At this point I can't get access to /dev/vda and needs a reboot to
get it and /mnt/test back.
This patch series results in the block device being mountable, but
remains frozen across unmount/mount:
# mount /dev/vda /mnt/test
# xfs_freeze -f /mnt/test
# umount /mnt/test
# grep test /proc/mounts
# mkfs.xfs -f -l size=128m /dev/vda
mkfs.xfs: /dev/vda contains a mounted filesystem
Usage: mkfs.xfs
....
# mount /dev/vda /mnt/test
# touch /mnt/test/foo &
[1] 2647
#
# xfs_freeze -u /mnt/test
[1]+ Done sudo touch /mnt/test/foo
# umount /mnt/test
# mkfs.xfs -f -l size=128m /dev/vda
meta-data=/dev/vda isize=256 agcount=4, agsize=262144 blks
= sectsz=512 attr=2
data = bsize=4096 blocks=1048576, imaxpct=25
= sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0
log =internal log bsize=4096 blocks=32768, version=2
= sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
#
This behaviour is only marginally better than the existing behaviour
(at least you can release the references). However, I don't really
like either option - we used to disallow umount on a frozen
filesystems to avoid this problem.
So What is really supposed to happen when we unmount a frozen
superblock? Should unmount return EBUSY? Should it be automatically
thawed so it doesn't affect block device behaviour after unmount?
Something else?
Cheers,
Dave.
next reply other threads:[~2010-06-10 7:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-10 7:19 Dave Chinner [this message]
2010-06-10 7:19 ` [PATCH 1/5] fsfreeze: Prevent emergency thaw from looping infinitely Dave Chinner
2010-06-14 15:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-14 23:19 ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-10 7:19 ` [PATCH 2/5] fsfreeze: emergency thaw will deadlock on s_umount Dave Chinner
2010-06-14 15:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-14 23:21 ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-21 1:57 ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-21 7:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-10 7:19 ` [PATCH 3/5] fsfreeze: freeze_super and thaw_bdev don't play well together Dave Chinner
2010-06-14 15:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-15 0:01 ` Dave Chinner
2010-06-15 6:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-10 7:19 ` [PATCH 4/5] fsfreeze: switch to using super methods everywhere Dave Chinner
2010-06-14 15:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-10 7:19 ` [PATCH 5/5] fsfreeze: move emergency thaw code to fs/super.c Dave Chinner
2010-06-14 15:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-06-10 12:45 ` [RFC, PATCH 0/5] fsfreeze: fix sb vs bdev freeze/thaw b0rkage Josef Bacik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1276154395-24766-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=jeffmerkey@gmail.com \
--cc=josef@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).