From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: Implement balance_dirty_pages() through waiting for flusher thread Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:59:04 +0200 Message-ID: <1277215144.1875.705.camel@laptop> References: <1276797878-28893-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> <20100618060901.GA6590@dastard> <20100621233628.GL3828@quack.suse.cz> <20100622054409.GP7869@dastard> <20100621231416.904c50c7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20100622100924.GQ7869@dastard> <20100622131745.GB3338@quack.suse.cz> <20100622135234.GA11561@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: Jan Kara , Dave Chinner , Andrew Morton , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, hch@infradead.org To: Wu Fengguang Return-path: Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:37643 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756148Ab0FVN7U convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jun 2010 09:59:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100622135234.GA11561@localhost> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 21:52 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > > This test shows that atomic_dec_and_test() is about 4.5 times slower > than plain i-- in a 4-core CPU. Not bad. It gets worse - much worse - on larger machines.