linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: sfrench@us.ibm.com, ffilz@us.ibm.com, agruen@suse.de,
	adilger@sun.com, sandeen@redhat.com, tytso@mit.edu,
	staubach@redhat.com, bfields@citi.umich.edu, jlayton@redhat.com
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH -V2 05/16] richacl: Permission mapping functions
Date: Sat,  3 Jul 2010 00:13:36 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1278096227-16784-6-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1278096227-16784-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de>

We need to map from POSIX permissions to NFSv4 permissions when a
chmod() is done, from NFSv4 permissions to POSIX permissions when an acl
is set (which implicitly sets the file permission bits), and from the
MAY_READ/MAY_WRITE/MAY_EXEC/MAY_APPEND flags to NFSv4 permissions when
doing an access check in a richacl.

Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 fs/richacl_base.c       |   98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/richacl.h |   27 +++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 125 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/richacl_base.c b/fs/richacl_base.c
index 99ed0ca..bfc0abf4 100644
--- a/fs/richacl_base.c
+++ b/fs/richacl_base.c
@@ -69,6 +69,104 @@ richacl_clone(const struct richacl *acl)
 }
 
 /**
+ * richacl_mask_to_mode  -  compute the file permission bits which correspond to @mask
+ * @mask:	%ACE4_* permission mask
+ *
+ * See richacl_masks_to_mode().
+ */
+static int
+richacl_mask_to_mode(unsigned int mask)
+{
+	int mode = 0;
+
+	if (mask & ACE4_POSIX_MODE_READ)
+		mode |= MAY_READ;
+	if (mask & ACE4_POSIX_MODE_WRITE)
+		mode |= MAY_WRITE;
+	if (mask & ACE4_POSIX_MODE_EXEC)
+		mode |= MAY_EXEC;
+
+	return mode;
+}
+
+/**
+ * richacl_masks_to_mode  -  compute the file permission bits from the file masks
+ *
+ * When setting a richacl, we set the file permission bits to indicate maximum
+ * permissions: for example, we set the Write permission when a mask contains
+ * ACE4_APPEND_DATA even if it does not also contain ACE4_WRITE_DATA.
+ *
+ * Permissions which are not in ACE4_POSIX_MODE_READ, ACE4_POSIX_MODE_WRITE, or
+ * ACE4_POSIX_MODE_EXEC cannot be represented in the file permission bits.
+ * Such permissions can still be effective, but not for new files or after a
+ * chmod(), and only if they were set explicitly, for example, by setting a
+ * richacl.
+ */
+int
+richacl_masks_to_mode(const struct richacl *acl)
+{
+	return richacl_mask_to_mode(acl->a_owner_mask) << 6 |
+	       richacl_mask_to_mode(acl->a_group_mask) << 3 |
+	       richacl_mask_to_mode(acl->a_other_mask);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(richacl_masks_to_mode);
+
+/**
+ * richacl_mode_to_mask  - compute a file mask from the lowest three mode bits
+ *
+ * When the file permission bits of a file are set with chmod(), this specifies
+ * the maximum permissions that processes will get.  All permissions beyond
+ * that will be removed from the file masks, and become ineffective.
+ *
+ * We also add in the permissions which are always allowed no matter what the
+ * acl says.
+ */
+unsigned int
+richacl_mode_to_mask(mode_t mode)
+{
+	unsigned int mask = ACE4_POSIX_ALWAYS_ALLOWED;
+
+	if (mode & MAY_READ)
+		mask |= ACE4_POSIX_MODE_READ;
+	if (mode & MAY_WRITE)
+		mask |= ACE4_POSIX_MODE_WRITE;
+	if (mode & MAY_EXEC)
+		mask |= ACE4_POSIX_MODE_EXEC;
+
+	return mask;
+}
+
+/**
+ * richacl_want_to_mask  - convert the iop->permission want argument to a mask
+ * @want:	@want argument of the permission inode operation
+ *
+ * When checking for append, @want is (MAY_WRITE | MAY_APPEND).
+ *
+ * Richacls use the iop->may_create and iop->may_delete hooks which are
+ * used for checking if creating and deleting files is allowed.  These hooks do
+ * not use richacl_want_to_mask(), so we do not have to deal with mapping
+ * MAY_WRITE to ACE4_ADD_FILE, ACE4_ADD_SUBDIRECTORY, and ACE4_DELETE_CHILD
+ * here.
+ */
+unsigned int
+richacl_want_to_mask(int want)
+{
+	unsigned int mask = 0;
+
+	if (want & MAY_READ)
+		mask |= ACE4_READ_DATA;
+	if (want & MAY_APPEND)
+		mask |= ACE4_APPEND_DATA;
+	else if (want & MAY_WRITE)
+		mask |= ACE4_WRITE_DATA;
+	if (want & MAY_EXEC)
+		mask |= ACE4_EXECUTE;
+
+	return mask;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(richacl_want_to_mask);
+
+/**
  * richace_is_same_identifier  -  are both identifiers the same?
  */
 int
diff --git a/include/linux/richacl.h b/include/linux/richacl.h
index 92cc8b5..8b9f7ef 100644
--- a/include/linux/richacl.h
+++ b/include/linux/richacl.h
@@ -111,6 +111,30 @@ struct richacl {
 	ACE4_WRITE_OWNER |				\
 	ACE4_SYNCHRONIZE)
 
+/*
+ * The POSIX permissions are supersets of the following NFSv4 permissions:
+ *
+ *  - MAY_READ maps to READ_DATA or LIST_DIRECTORY, depending on the type
+ *    of the file system object.
+ *
+ *  - MAY_WRITE maps to WRITE_DATA or ACE4_APPEND_DATA for files, and to
+ *    ADD_FILE, ACE4_ADD_SUBDIRECTORY, or ACE4_DELETE_CHILD for directories.
+ *
+ *  - MAY_EXECUTE maps to ACE4_EXECUTE.
+ *
+ *  (Some of these NFSv4 permissions have the same bit values.)
+ */
+#define ACE4_POSIX_MODE_READ ( \
+	ACE4_READ_DATA | ACE4_LIST_DIRECTORY)
+#define ACE4_POSIX_MODE_WRITE ( \
+	ACE4_WRITE_DATA | ACE4_ADD_FILE | \
+	ACE4_APPEND_DATA | ACE4_ADD_SUBDIRECTORY | \
+	ACE4_DELETE_CHILD)
+#define ACE4_POSIX_MODE_EXEC ( \
+	ACE4_EXECUTE)
+#define ACE4_POSIX_MODE_ALL (ACE4_POSIX_MODE_READ | ACE4_POSIX_MODE_WRITE | \
+			     ACE4_POSIX_MODE_EXEC)
+
 /* These permissions are always allowed no matter what the acl says. */
 #define ACE4_POSIX_ALWAYS_ALLOWED (	\
 	ACE4_SYNCHRONIZE |		\
@@ -241,5 +265,8 @@ extern struct richacl *richacl_alloc(int);
 extern int richace_is_same_identifier(const struct richace *,
 				      const struct richace *);
 extern int richace_set_who(struct richace *, const char *);
+extern int richacl_masks_to_mode(const struct richacl *);
+extern unsigned int richacl_mode_to_mask(mode_t);
+extern unsigned int richacl_want_to_mask(int);
 
 #endif /* __RICHACL_H */
-- 
1.7.2.rc1

_______________________________________________
NOTE: THIS LIST IS DEPRECATED.  Please use linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org instead.
(To subscribe to linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org: send "subscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org.)

NFSv4 mailing list
NFSv4@linux-nfs.org
http://linux-nfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-07-02 18:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-02 18:43 [PATCH -V2 00/16] New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-07-02 18:43 ` [PATCH -V2 01/16] vfs: Hooks for more fine-grained directory permission checking Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-07-02 18:43 ` [PATCH -V2 02/16] vfs: Add generic IS_ACL() test for acl support Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-07-02 18:43 ` [PATCH -V2 03/16] vfs: Add IS_RICHACL() test for richacl support Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-07-02 18:43 ` [PATCH -V2 04/16] richacl: In-memory representation and helper functions Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-07-02 18:43 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2010-07-02 18:43 ` [PATCH -V2 06/16] richacl: Compute maximum file masks from an acl Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-07-02 18:43 ` [PATCH -V2 07/16] richacl: Update the file masks in chmod() Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-07-02 18:43 ` [PATCH -V2 08/16] richacl: Permission check algorithm Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-07-02 18:43 ` [PATCH -V2 09/16] richacl: Helper functions for implementing richacl inode operations Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-07-02 18:43 ` [PATCH -V2 10/16] richacl: Create-time inheritance Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-07-02 18:43 ` [PATCH -V2 11/16] richacl: Check if an acl is equivalent to a file mode Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-07-02 18:43 ` [PATCH -V2 12/16] richacl: Automatic Inheritance Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-07-02 18:43 ` [PATCH -V2 13/16] richacl: xattr mapping functions Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-07-02 18:43 ` [PATCH -V2 14/16] ext4: Use IS_POSIXACL() to check for POSIX ACL support Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-07-02 18:43 ` [PATCH -V2 15/16] ext4: Implement rich acl for ext4 Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-07-02 18:43 ` [PATCH -V2 16/16] ext4: Add temporary richacl mount option " Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-07-03 10:53   ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-07-03 10:50 ` [PATCH -V2 00/16] New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-07-19 19:19 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-07-20  9:31   ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-07-20 10:11     ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-07-20 15:23       ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-07-20 15:52         ` Andreas Gruenbacher

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1278096227-16784-6-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=adilger@sun.com \
    --cc=agruen@suse.de \
    --cc=bfields@citi.umich.edu \
    --cc=ffilz@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nfsv4@linux-nfs.org \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=sfrench@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=staubach@redhat.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).