From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave.bueso@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH procfs] Add process age
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 11:10:29 -0400
Message-ID: <1280157029.2212.17.camel@cowboy>
References: <1279907271.4335.3.camel@cowboy> <20100723183549.GA10518@x200>
	 <1279910830.1851.5.camel@cowboy> <87fwz6it0e.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
	 <1280152668.2212.1.camel@cowboy>  <20100726144848.GC17756@basil.fritz.box>
Reply-To: dave.bueso@gmail.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100726144848.GC17756@basil.fritz.box>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 16:48 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > True, but there are also many other no-so-useful files under /proc that
> > can also be replaced by userspace apps.
> 
> Example? 

Off the top of my head:

/proc/cmdline
Several entries in /proc/#/status, like Name, PPid, Gid, Uid, etc.

I am not criticizing this, I think some repetitive data is good for
users. Just showing that other features can also be obtained from
userspace.

Davidlohr