linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] dio: scale unaligned IO tracking via multiple lists
Date: Tue,  3 Aug 2010 17:23:23 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1280820204-1418-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1280820204-1418-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>

From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>

To avoid concerns that a single list and lock tracking the unaligned
IOs will not scale appropriately, create multiple lists and locks
and chose them by hashing the unaligned block being zeroed.

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
---
 fs/direct-io.c |   49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/direct-io.c b/fs/direct-io.c
index 865749e..368abec 100644
--- a/fs/direct-io.c
+++ b/fs/direct-io.c
@@ -152,8 +152,28 @@ struct dio_zero_block {
 	atomic_t	ref;		/* reference count */
 };
 
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(dio_zero_block_lock);
-static LIST_HEAD(dio_zero_block_list);
+#define DIO_ZERO_BLOCK_NR	37LL
+struct dio_zero_block_head {
+	struct list_head	list;
+	spinlock_t		lock;
+};
+
+static struct dio_zero_block_head dio_zero_blocks[DIO_ZERO_BLOCK_NR];
+#define to_dio_zero_head(zb)	(&dio_zero_blocks[zb % DIO_ZERO_BLOCK_NR])
+
+
+static int __init
+dio_init_zero_block(void)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < DIO_ZERO_BLOCK_NR; i++) {
+		spin_lock_init(&dio_zero_blocks[i].lock);
+		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dio_zero_blocks[i].list);
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+subsys_initcall(dio_init_zero_block);
 
 /*
  * Add a filesystem block to the list of blocks we are tracking.
@@ -161,6 +181,7 @@ static LIST_HEAD(dio_zero_block_list);
 static void
 dio_start_zero_block(struct dio *dio, sector_t zero_block)
 {
+	struct dio_zero_block_head *zbh = to_dio_zero_head(zero_block);
 	struct dio_zero_block *zb;
 
 	zb = kmalloc(sizeof(*zb), GFP_NOIO);
@@ -172,9 +193,9 @@ dio_start_zero_block(struct dio *dio, sector_t zero_block)
 	zb->dio = dio;
 	atomic_set(&zb->ref, 1);
 
-	spin_lock(&dio_zero_block_lock);
-	list_add(&zb->dio_list, &dio_zero_block_list);
-	spin_unlock(&dio_zero_block_lock);
+	spin_lock(&zbh->lock);
+	list_add(&zb->dio_list, &zbh->list);
+	spin_unlock(&zbh->lock);
 }
 
 static void
@@ -193,21 +214,22 @@ dio_drop_zero_block(struct dio_zero_block *zb)
 static int
 dio_wait_zero_block(struct dio *dio, sector_t zero_block)
 {
+	struct dio_zero_block_head *zbh = to_dio_zero_head(zero_block);
 	struct dio_zero_block *zb;
 
-	spin_lock(&dio_zero_block_lock);
-	list_for_each_entry(zb, &dio_zero_block_list, dio_list) {
+	spin_lock(&zbh->lock);
+	list_for_each_entry(zb, &zbh->list, dio_list) {
 		if (zb->dio->inode != dio->inode)
 			continue;
 		if (zb->zero_block != zero_block)
 			continue;
 		atomic_inc(&zb->ref);
-		spin_unlock(&dio_zero_block_lock);
+		spin_unlock(&zbh->lock);
 		wait_event(zb->wq, (list_empty(&zb->dio_list)));
 		dio_drop_zero_block(zb);
 		return 1;
 	}
-	spin_unlock(&dio_zero_block_lock);
+	spin_unlock(&zbh->lock);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -216,21 +238,22 @@ dio_wait_zero_block(struct dio *dio, sector_t zero_block)
  */
 static void dio_end_zero_block(struct dio *dio, sector_t zero_block)
 {
+	struct dio_zero_block_head *zbh = to_dio_zero_head(zero_block);
 	struct dio_zero_block *zb;
 
-	spin_lock(&dio_zero_block_lock);
-	list_for_each_entry(zb, &dio_zero_block_list, dio_list) {
+	spin_lock(&zbh->lock);
+	list_for_each_entry(zb, &zbh->list, dio_list) {
 		if (zb->dio->inode != dio->inode)
 			continue;
 		if (zb->zero_block != zero_block)
 			continue;
 		list_del_init(&zb->dio_list);
-		spin_unlock(&dio_zero_block_lock);
+		spin_unlock(&zbh->lock);
 		wake_up(&zb->wq);
 		dio_drop_zero_block(zb);
 		return;
 	}
-	spin_unlock(&dio_zero_block_lock);
+	spin_unlock(&zbh->lock);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
1.7.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-08-03  7:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-03  7:23 [PATCH 0/3] dio: serialise unaligned direct IO V3 Dave Chinner
2010-08-03  7:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] dio: track and serialise unaligned direct IO Dave Chinner
2010-08-03  7:23 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2010-08-03  7:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] dio: add a mempool for the unaligned block structures Dave Chinner
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-11-08  7:40 [REPOST, PATCH 0/3] dio: serialise unaligned direct IO Dave Chinner
2010-11-08  7:40 ` [PATCH 2/3] dio: scale unaligned IO tracking via multiple lists Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 15:36   ` Jeff Moyer
2010-11-08 23:12     ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-09 21:04       ` Jeff Moyer
2010-11-09 23:06         ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-11 15:32           ` Jeff Moyer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1280820204-1418-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).