linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: andi.kleen@intel.com, alexs.shi@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: scalability investigation: Where can I get your latest patches?
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 09:04:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1280883843.2125.20.camel@ymzhang.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100720031201.GC21274@amd>

On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 13:12 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 04:56:27PM +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> > Nick,
> > 
> > I work with Andi Kleen and Tim to investigate some scalability issues.
> > 
> > Andi gave me a pointer at:
> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1002380/focus=42284
> > 
> > Where can I get your latest patches? It's better if I could get patch tarball.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Yanmin
> > 
> 
> Hi Yanmin,
> 
> Sorry for the delay. I have a git tree now, and it has been through
> some tress testing.
> 
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/npiggin/linux-npiggin.git
> 
> I would be very interested to know if you encounter problems or are
> able to generate any benchmark numbers.
Nick,

We ran lots of benchmarks on many machines. Below is something to share with you.

Improvement:
1) We get about 30% improvement with kbuild workload on Nehalem machines. It's hard
to improve kbuild performance. Your tree does.

Issues:
1) Compiling fails on a couple of file systems, such like CONFIG_ISO9660_FS=y.
2) dbenchthreads has about 50% regression. We connect a JBOD of 12 disks to
a machine. Start 4 dbench threads per disk.
We run the workload under a regular user account. If we run it under root account,
we get 22% improvement instead of regression.
The root cause is ACL checking. With your patch, do_path_lookup firstly goes through
rcu steps which including a exec permission checking. With ACL, the __exec_permission
always fails. Then a later nameidata_drop_rcu often fails as dentry->d_seq is changed.

With root account, it doesn't happen. We mount the working devices under /mnt/stp/XXX.
/mnt is of root user. So the exec permission check is ok.

I remount all file systems on the testing path with noacl option, and get the similar
results like under root account.

3) aim7 has about 40% regression on Nehalem EX 4-socket machine. The root cause is the
same thing like 2).

Other benchmarks' results have no improvement or regression.

Yanmin



       reply	other threads:[~2010-08-04  1:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1278579387.2096.889.camel@ymzhang.sh.intel.com>
     [not found] ` <20100720031201.GC21274@amd>
2010-08-04  1:04   ` Zhang, Yanmin [this message]
2010-08-04  7:21     ` scalability investigation: Where can I get your latest patches? Kleen, Andi
2010-08-04  7:58       ` Zhang, Yanmin
2010-08-04  8:06         ` Kleen, Andi
2010-08-04  8:50           ` Zhang, Yanmin
2010-08-05 10:57             ` Nick Piggin
2010-08-05 10:55     ` Nick Piggin
2010-08-09  2:11       ` Zhang, Yanmin
2010-08-09  3:20       ` Zhang, Yanmin
2010-08-05 11:44     ` Nick Piggin
2010-08-09  2:36       ` Zhang, Yanmin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1280883843.2125.20.camel@ymzhang.sh.intel.com \
    --to=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexs.shi@intel.com \
    --cc=andi.kleen@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).