From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: jaxboe@fusionio.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, hch@l
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 22/30] reiserfs: replace barriers with explicit flush / FUA usage
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:47:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1282751267-3530-23-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1282751267-3530-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Switch to the WRITE_FLUSH_FUA flag for log writes and remove the EOPNOTSUPP
detection for barriers. Note that reiserfs had a fairly different code
path for barriers before as it wa the only filesystem actually making use
of them. The new code always uses the old non-barrier codepath and just
sets the WRITE_FLUSH_FUA explicitly for the journal commits.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
fs/reiserfs/journal.c | 106 +++++++++---------------------------------------
1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/journal.c b/fs/reiserfs/journal.c
index 812e2c0..076c8b1 100644
--- a/fs/reiserfs/journal.c
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/journal.c
@@ -138,13 +138,6 @@ static int reiserfs_clean_and_file_buffer(struct buffer_head *bh)
return 0;
}
-static void disable_barrier(struct super_block *s)
-{
- REISERFS_SB(s)->s_mount_opt &= ~(1 << REISERFS_BARRIER_FLUSH);
- printk("reiserfs: disabling flush barriers on %s\n",
- reiserfs_bdevname(s));
-}
-
static struct reiserfs_bitmap_node *allocate_bitmap_node(struct super_block
*sb)
{
@@ -677,30 +670,6 @@ static void submit_ordered_buffer(struct buffer_head *bh)
submit_bh(WRITE, bh);
}
-static int submit_barrier_buffer(struct buffer_head *bh)
-{
- get_bh(bh);
- bh->b_end_io = reiserfs_end_ordered_io;
- clear_buffer_dirty(bh);
- if (!buffer_uptodate(bh))
- BUG();
- return submit_bh(WRITE_BARRIER, bh);
-}
-
-static void check_barrier_completion(struct super_block *s,
- struct buffer_head *bh)
-{
- if (buffer_eopnotsupp(bh)) {
- clear_buffer_eopnotsupp(bh);
- disable_barrier(s);
- set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
- set_buffer_dirty(bh);
- reiserfs_write_unlock(s);
- sync_dirty_buffer(bh);
- reiserfs_write_lock(s);
- }
-}
-
#define CHUNK_SIZE 32
struct buffer_chunk {
struct buffer_head *bh[CHUNK_SIZE];
@@ -1009,7 +978,6 @@ static int flush_commit_list(struct super_block *s,
struct buffer_head *tbh = NULL;
unsigned int trans_id = jl->j_trans_id;
struct reiserfs_journal *journal = SB_JOURNAL(s);
- int barrier = 0;
int retval = 0;
int write_len;
@@ -1094,24 +1062,6 @@ static int flush_commit_list(struct super_block *s,
}
atomic_dec(&journal->j_async_throttle);
- /* We're skipping the commit if there's an error */
- if (retval || reiserfs_is_journal_aborted(journal))
- barrier = 0;
-
- /* wait on everything written so far before writing the commit
- * if we are in barrier mode, send the commit down now
- */
- barrier = reiserfs_barrier_flush(s);
- if (barrier) {
- int ret;
- lock_buffer(jl->j_commit_bh);
- ret = submit_barrier_buffer(jl->j_commit_bh);
- if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP) {
- set_buffer_uptodate(jl->j_commit_bh);
- disable_barrier(s);
- barrier = 0;
- }
- }
for (i = 0; i < (jl->j_len + 1); i++) {
bn = SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_1st_BLOCK(s) +
(jl->j_start + i) % SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_SIZE(s);
@@ -1143,27 +1093,22 @@ static int flush_commit_list(struct super_block *s,
BUG_ON(atomic_read(&(jl->j_commit_left)) != 1);
- if (!barrier) {
- /* If there was a write error in the journal - we can't commit
- * this transaction - it will be invalid and, if successful,
- * will just end up propagating the write error out to
- * the file system. */
- if (likely(!retval && !reiserfs_is_journal_aborted (journal))) {
- if (buffer_dirty(jl->j_commit_bh))
- BUG();
- mark_buffer_dirty(jl->j_commit_bh) ;
- reiserfs_write_unlock(s);
- sync_dirty_buffer(jl->j_commit_bh) ;
- reiserfs_write_lock(s);
- }
- } else {
+ /* If there was a write error in the journal - we can't commit
+ * this transaction - it will be invalid and, if successful,
+ * will just end up propagating the write error out to
+ * the file system. */
+ if (likely(!retval && !reiserfs_is_journal_aborted (journal))) {
+ if (buffer_dirty(jl->j_commit_bh))
+ BUG();
+ mark_buffer_dirty(jl->j_commit_bh) ;
reiserfs_write_unlock(s);
- wait_on_buffer(jl->j_commit_bh);
+ if (reiserfs_barrier_flush(s))
+ __sync_dirty_buffer(jl->j_commit_bh, WRITE_FLUSH_FUA);
+ else
+ sync_dirty_buffer(jl->j_commit_bh);
reiserfs_write_lock(s);
}
- check_barrier_completion(s, jl->j_commit_bh);
-
/* If there was a write error in the journal - we can't commit this
* transaction - it will be invalid and, if successful, will just end
* up propagating the write error out to the filesystem. */
@@ -1319,26 +1264,15 @@ static int _update_journal_header_block(struct super_block *sb,
jh->j_first_unflushed_offset = cpu_to_le32(offset);
jh->j_mount_id = cpu_to_le32(journal->j_mount_id);
- if (reiserfs_barrier_flush(sb)) {
- int ret;
- lock_buffer(journal->j_header_bh);
- ret = submit_barrier_buffer(journal->j_header_bh);
- if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP) {
- set_buffer_uptodate(journal->j_header_bh);
- disable_barrier(sb);
- goto sync;
- }
- reiserfs_write_unlock(sb);
- wait_on_buffer(journal->j_header_bh);
- reiserfs_write_lock(sb);
- check_barrier_completion(sb, journal->j_header_bh);
- } else {
- sync:
- set_buffer_dirty(journal->j_header_bh);
- reiserfs_write_unlock(sb);
+ set_buffer_dirty(journal->j_header_bh);
+ reiserfs_write_unlock(sb);
+
+ if (reiserfs_barrier_flush(sb))
+ __sync_dirty_buffer(journal->j_header_bh, WRITE_FLUSH_FUA);
+ else
sync_dirty_buffer(journal->j_header_bh);
- reiserfs_write_lock(sb);
- }
+
+ reiserfs_write_lock(sb);
if (!buffer_uptodate(journal->j_header_bh)) {
reiserfs_warning(sb, "journal-837",
"IO error during journal replay");
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-25 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-25 15:47 [PATCHSET 2.6.36-rc2] block, fs: replace HARDBARRIER with FLUSH/FUA Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 01/30] ide: remove unnecessary blk_queue_flushing() test in do_ide_request() Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 02/30] block/loop: queue ordered mode should be DRAIN_FLUSH Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 03/30] block: kill QUEUE_ORDERED_BY_TAG Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 04/30] block: deprecate barrier and replace blk_queue_ordered() with blk_queue_flush() Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 15:37 ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 05/30] block: remove spurious uses of REQ_HARDBARRIER Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 06/30] block: misc cleanups in barrier code Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 07/30] block: drop barrier ordering by queue draining Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 08/30] block: rename blk-barrier.c to blk-flush.c Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 09/30] block: rename barrier/ordered to flush Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 10/30] block: implement REQ_FLUSH/FUA based interface for FLUSH/FUA requests Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 11/30] block: filter flush bio's in __generic_make_request() Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 12/30] block: use REQ_FLUSH in blkdev_issue_flush() Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 13/30] block: simplify queue_next_fseq Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 14/30] block/loop: implement REQ_FLUSH/FUA support Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 15/30] virtio_blk: drop REQ_HARDBARRIER support Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 16/30] lguest: replace VIRTIO_F_BARRIER support with VIRTIO_F_FLUSH support Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 17/30] md: implment REQ_FLUSH/FUA support Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 18/30] block: pass gfp_mask and flags to sb_issue_discard Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 19/30] xfs: replace barriers with explicit flush / FUA usage Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 20/30] btrfs: " Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 21/30] gfs2: " Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 23/30] nilfs2: " Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 24/30] jbd: " Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 25/30] jbd2: " Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 26/30] ext4: do not send discards as barriers Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-25 16:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-25 15:57 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 20:02 ` Jan Kara
2010-08-26 8:25 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-27 17:31 ` Jan Kara
2010-08-30 19:56 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-08-30 20:20 ` Jan Kara
2010-08-30 20:24 ` Ric Wheeler
2010-08-30 20:39 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2010-08-30 21:02 ` Jan Kara
2010-08-31 9:55 ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-09-02 18:46 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2010-08-30 21:01 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-08-31 8:11 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-31 10:07 ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-08-31 10:13 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-31 10:27 ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-09-09 22:53 ` Jan Kara
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 27/30] fat: " Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 28/30] swap: " Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 29/30] block: remove the BLKDEV_IFL_BARRIER flag Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 30/30] block: remove the BH_Eopnotsupp flag Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 16:03 ` [PATCHSET 2.6.36-rc2] block, fs: replace HARDBARRIER with FLUSH/FUA Mike Snitzer
2010-08-26 8:23 ` [PATCH 24.5/30] jbd2: Modify ASYNC_COMMIT code to not rely on queue draining on barrier Tejun Heo
2010-08-26 9:33 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2010-08-26 9:37 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2010-09-06 11:15 ` [PATCH " Andreas Dilger
2010-09-06 11:40 ` Jan Kara
2010-08-26 9:54 ` [PATCH] block: update documentation for REQ_FLUSH / REQ_FUA Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-27 9:18 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1282751267-3530-23-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@l \
--cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).