linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: jaxboe@fusionio.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, hch@l
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 22/30] reiserfs: replace barriers with explicit flush / FUA usage
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:47:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1282751267-3530-23-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1282751267-3530-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>

Switch to the WRITE_FLUSH_FUA flag for log writes and remove the EOPNOTSUPP
detection for barriers.  Note that reiserfs had a fairly different code
path for barriers before as it wa the only filesystem actually making use
of them.  The new code always uses the old non-barrier codepath and just
sets the WRITE_FLUSH_FUA explicitly for the journal commits.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
 fs/reiserfs/journal.c |  106 +++++++++---------------------------------------
 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/journal.c b/fs/reiserfs/journal.c
index 812e2c0..076c8b1 100644
--- a/fs/reiserfs/journal.c
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/journal.c
@@ -138,13 +138,6 @@ static int reiserfs_clean_and_file_buffer(struct buffer_head *bh)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void disable_barrier(struct super_block *s)
-{
-	REISERFS_SB(s)->s_mount_opt &= ~(1 << REISERFS_BARRIER_FLUSH);
-	printk("reiserfs: disabling flush barriers on %s\n",
-	       reiserfs_bdevname(s));
-}
-
 static struct reiserfs_bitmap_node *allocate_bitmap_node(struct super_block
 							 *sb)
 {
@@ -677,30 +670,6 @@ static void submit_ordered_buffer(struct buffer_head *bh)
 	submit_bh(WRITE, bh);
 }
 
-static int submit_barrier_buffer(struct buffer_head *bh)
-{
-	get_bh(bh);
-	bh->b_end_io = reiserfs_end_ordered_io;
-	clear_buffer_dirty(bh);
-	if (!buffer_uptodate(bh))
-		BUG();
-	return submit_bh(WRITE_BARRIER, bh);
-}
-
-static void check_barrier_completion(struct super_block *s,
-				     struct buffer_head *bh)
-{
-	if (buffer_eopnotsupp(bh)) {
-		clear_buffer_eopnotsupp(bh);
-		disable_barrier(s);
-		set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
-		set_buffer_dirty(bh);
-		reiserfs_write_unlock(s);
-		sync_dirty_buffer(bh);
-		reiserfs_write_lock(s);
-	}
-}
-
 #define CHUNK_SIZE 32
 struct buffer_chunk {
 	struct buffer_head *bh[CHUNK_SIZE];
@@ -1009,7 +978,6 @@ static int flush_commit_list(struct super_block *s,
 	struct buffer_head *tbh = NULL;
 	unsigned int trans_id = jl->j_trans_id;
 	struct reiserfs_journal *journal = SB_JOURNAL(s);
-	int barrier = 0;
 	int retval = 0;
 	int write_len;
 
@@ -1094,24 +1062,6 @@ static int flush_commit_list(struct super_block *s,
 	}
 	atomic_dec(&journal->j_async_throttle);
 
-	/* We're skipping the commit if there's an error */
-	if (retval || reiserfs_is_journal_aborted(journal))
-		barrier = 0;
-
-	/* wait on everything written so far before writing the commit
-	 * if we are in barrier mode, send the commit down now
-	 */
-	barrier = reiserfs_barrier_flush(s);
-	if (barrier) {
-		int ret;
-		lock_buffer(jl->j_commit_bh);
-		ret = submit_barrier_buffer(jl->j_commit_bh);
-		if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP) {
-			set_buffer_uptodate(jl->j_commit_bh);
-			disable_barrier(s);
-			barrier = 0;
-		}
-	}
 	for (i = 0; i < (jl->j_len + 1); i++) {
 		bn = SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_1st_BLOCK(s) +
 		    (jl->j_start + i) % SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_SIZE(s);
@@ -1143,27 +1093,22 @@ static int flush_commit_list(struct super_block *s,
 
 	BUG_ON(atomic_read(&(jl->j_commit_left)) != 1);
 
-	if (!barrier) {
-		/* If there was a write error in the journal - we can't commit
-		 * this transaction - it will be invalid and, if successful,
-		 * will just end up propagating the write error out to
-		 * the file system. */
-		if (likely(!retval && !reiserfs_is_journal_aborted (journal))) {
-			if (buffer_dirty(jl->j_commit_bh))
-				BUG();
-			mark_buffer_dirty(jl->j_commit_bh) ;
-			reiserfs_write_unlock(s);
-			sync_dirty_buffer(jl->j_commit_bh) ;
-			reiserfs_write_lock(s);
-		}
-	} else {
+	/* If there was a write error in the journal - we can't commit
+	 * this transaction - it will be invalid and, if successful,
+	 * will just end up propagating the write error out to
+	 * the file system. */
+	if (likely(!retval && !reiserfs_is_journal_aborted (journal))) {
+		if (buffer_dirty(jl->j_commit_bh))
+			BUG();
+		mark_buffer_dirty(jl->j_commit_bh) ;
 		reiserfs_write_unlock(s);
-		wait_on_buffer(jl->j_commit_bh);
+		if (reiserfs_barrier_flush(s))
+			__sync_dirty_buffer(jl->j_commit_bh, WRITE_FLUSH_FUA);
+		else
+			sync_dirty_buffer(jl->j_commit_bh);
 		reiserfs_write_lock(s);
 	}
 
-	check_barrier_completion(s, jl->j_commit_bh);
-
 	/* If there was a write error in the journal - we can't commit this
 	 * transaction - it will be invalid and, if successful, will just end
 	 * up propagating the write error out to the filesystem. */
@@ -1319,26 +1264,15 @@ static int _update_journal_header_block(struct super_block *sb,
 		jh->j_first_unflushed_offset = cpu_to_le32(offset);
 		jh->j_mount_id = cpu_to_le32(journal->j_mount_id);
 
-		if (reiserfs_barrier_flush(sb)) {
-			int ret;
-			lock_buffer(journal->j_header_bh);
-			ret = submit_barrier_buffer(journal->j_header_bh);
-			if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP) {
-				set_buffer_uptodate(journal->j_header_bh);
-				disable_barrier(sb);
-				goto sync;
-			}
-			reiserfs_write_unlock(sb);
-			wait_on_buffer(journal->j_header_bh);
-			reiserfs_write_lock(sb);
-			check_barrier_completion(sb, journal->j_header_bh);
-		} else {
-		      sync:
-			set_buffer_dirty(journal->j_header_bh);
-			reiserfs_write_unlock(sb);
+		set_buffer_dirty(journal->j_header_bh);
+		reiserfs_write_unlock(sb);
+
+		if (reiserfs_barrier_flush(sb))
+			__sync_dirty_buffer(journal->j_header_bh, WRITE_FLUSH_FUA);
+		else
 			sync_dirty_buffer(journal->j_header_bh);
-			reiserfs_write_lock(sb);
-		}
+
+		reiserfs_write_lock(sb);
 		if (!buffer_uptodate(journal->j_header_bh)) {
 			reiserfs_warning(sb, "journal-837",
 					 "IO error during journal replay");
-- 
1.7.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-08-25 15:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-25 15:47 [PATCHSET 2.6.36-rc2] block, fs: replace HARDBARRIER with FLUSH/FUA Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 01/30] ide: remove unnecessary blk_queue_flushing() test in do_ide_request() Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 02/30] block/loop: queue ordered mode should be DRAIN_FLUSH Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 03/30] block: kill QUEUE_ORDERED_BY_TAG Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 04/30] block: deprecate barrier and replace blk_queue_ordered() with blk_queue_flush() Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 15:37   ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 05/30] block: remove spurious uses of REQ_HARDBARRIER Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 06/30] block: misc cleanups in barrier code Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 07/30] block: drop barrier ordering by queue draining Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 08/30] block: rename blk-barrier.c to blk-flush.c Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 09/30] block: rename barrier/ordered to flush Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 10/30] block: implement REQ_FLUSH/FUA based interface for FLUSH/FUA requests Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 11/30] block: filter flush bio's in __generic_make_request() Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 12/30] block: use REQ_FLUSH in blkdev_issue_flush() Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 13/30] block: simplify queue_next_fseq Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 14/30] block/loop: implement REQ_FLUSH/FUA support Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 15/30] virtio_blk: drop REQ_HARDBARRIER support Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 16/30] lguest: replace VIRTIO_F_BARRIER support with VIRTIO_F_FLUSH support Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 17/30] md: implment REQ_FLUSH/FUA support Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 18/30] block: pass gfp_mask and flags to sb_issue_discard Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 19/30] xfs: replace barriers with explicit flush / FUA usage Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 20/30] btrfs: " Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 21/30] gfs2: " Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 23/30] nilfs2: " Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 24/30] jbd: " Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 25/30] jbd2: " Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 26/30] ext4: do not send discards as barriers Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:58   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-25 16:00     ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-25 15:57       ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 20:02         ` Jan Kara
2010-08-26  8:25           ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-27 17:31             ` Jan Kara
2010-08-30 19:56               ` Jeff Moyer
2010-08-30 20:20                 ` Jan Kara
2010-08-30 20:24                   ` Ric Wheeler
2010-08-30 20:39                   ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2010-08-30 21:02                     ` Jan Kara
2010-08-31  9:55                       ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-09-02 18:46                         ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2010-08-30 21:01                   ` Jeff Moyer
2010-08-31  8:11                   ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-31 10:07                     ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-08-31 10:13                       ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-31 10:27                         ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-09-09 22:53                     ` Jan Kara
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 27/30] fat: " Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 28/30] swap: " Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 29/30] block: remove the BLKDEV_IFL_BARRIER flag Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 15:59   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 30/30] block: remove the BH_Eopnotsupp flag Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 16:03 ` [PATCHSET 2.6.36-rc2] block, fs: replace HARDBARRIER with FLUSH/FUA Mike Snitzer
2010-08-26  8:23 ` [PATCH 24.5/30] jbd2: Modify ASYNC_COMMIT code to not rely on queue draining on barrier Tejun Heo
2010-08-26  9:33   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2010-08-26  9:37   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2010-09-06 11:15   ` [PATCH " Andreas Dilger
2010-09-06 11:40     ` Jan Kara
2010-08-26  9:54 ` [PATCH] block: update documentation for REQ_FLUSH / REQ_FUA Christoph Hellwig
2010-08-27  9:18   ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1282751267-3530-23-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hch@l \
    --cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).