linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: jaxboe@fusionio.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
	dm-devel@redhat.co
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 31/41] reiserfs: replace barriers with explicit flush / FUA usage
Date: Fri,  3 Sep 2010 12:29:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1283509796-1510-32-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1283509796-1510-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>

Switch to the WRITE_FLUSH_FUA flag for log writes and remove the EOPNOTSUPP
detection for barriers.  Note that reiserfs had a fairly different code
path for barriers before as it wa the only filesystem actually making use
of them.  The new code always uses the old non-barrier codepath and just
sets the WRITE_FLUSH_FUA explicitly for the journal commits.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
 fs/reiserfs/journal.c |  106 +++++++++---------------------------------------
 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/journal.c b/fs/reiserfs/journal.c
index 812e2c0..076c8b1 100644
--- a/fs/reiserfs/journal.c
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/journal.c
@@ -138,13 +138,6 @@ static int reiserfs_clean_and_file_buffer(struct buffer_head *bh)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void disable_barrier(struct super_block *s)
-{
-	REISERFS_SB(s)->s_mount_opt &= ~(1 << REISERFS_BARRIER_FLUSH);
-	printk("reiserfs: disabling flush barriers on %s\n",
-	       reiserfs_bdevname(s));
-}
-
 static struct reiserfs_bitmap_node *allocate_bitmap_node(struct super_block
 							 *sb)
 {
@@ -677,30 +670,6 @@ static void submit_ordered_buffer(struct buffer_head *bh)
 	submit_bh(WRITE, bh);
 }
 
-static int submit_barrier_buffer(struct buffer_head *bh)
-{
-	get_bh(bh);
-	bh->b_end_io = reiserfs_end_ordered_io;
-	clear_buffer_dirty(bh);
-	if (!buffer_uptodate(bh))
-		BUG();
-	return submit_bh(WRITE_BARRIER, bh);
-}
-
-static void check_barrier_completion(struct super_block *s,
-				     struct buffer_head *bh)
-{
-	if (buffer_eopnotsupp(bh)) {
-		clear_buffer_eopnotsupp(bh);
-		disable_barrier(s);
-		set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
-		set_buffer_dirty(bh);
-		reiserfs_write_unlock(s);
-		sync_dirty_buffer(bh);
-		reiserfs_write_lock(s);
-	}
-}
-
 #define CHUNK_SIZE 32
 struct buffer_chunk {
 	struct buffer_head *bh[CHUNK_SIZE];
@@ -1009,7 +978,6 @@ static int flush_commit_list(struct super_block *s,
 	struct buffer_head *tbh = NULL;
 	unsigned int trans_id = jl->j_trans_id;
 	struct reiserfs_journal *journal = SB_JOURNAL(s);
-	int barrier = 0;
 	int retval = 0;
 	int write_len;
 
@@ -1094,24 +1062,6 @@ static int flush_commit_list(struct super_block *s,
 	}
 	atomic_dec(&journal->j_async_throttle);
 
-	/* We're skipping the commit if there's an error */
-	if (retval || reiserfs_is_journal_aborted(journal))
-		barrier = 0;
-
-	/* wait on everything written so far before writing the commit
-	 * if we are in barrier mode, send the commit down now
-	 */
-	barrier = reiserfs_barrier_flush(s);
-	if (barrier) {
-		int ret;
-		lock_buffer(jl->j_commit_bh);
-		ret = submit_barrier_buffer(jl->j_commit_bh);
-		if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP) {
-			set_buffer_uptodate(jl->j_commit_bh);
-			disable_barrier(s);
-			barrier = 0;
-		}
-	}
 	for (i = 0; i < (jl->j_len + 1); i++) {
 		bn = SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_1st_BLOCK(s) +
 		    (jl->j_start + i) % SB_ONDISK_JOURNAL_SIZE(s);
@@ -1143,27 +1093,22 @@ static int flush_commit_list(struct super_block *s,
 
 	BUG_ON(atomic_read(&(jl->j_commit_left)) != 1);
 
-	if (!barrier) {
-		/* If there was a write error in the journal - we can't commit
-		 * this transaction - it will be invalid and, if successful,
-		 * will just end up propagating the write error out to
-		 * the file system. */
-		if (likely(!retval && !reiserfs_is_journal_aborted (journal))) {
-			if (buffer_dirty(jl->j_commit_bh))
-				BUG();
-			mark_buffer_dirty(jl->j_commit_bh) ;
-			reiserfs_write_unlock(s);
-			sync_dirty_buffer(jl->j_commit_bh) ;
-			reiserfs_write_lock(s);
-		}
-	} else {
+	/* If there was a write error in the journal - we can't commit
+	 * this transaction - it will be invalid and, if successful,
+	 * will just end up propagating the write error out to
+	 * the file system. */
+	if (likely(!retval && !reiserfs_is_journal_aborted (journal))) {
+		if (buffer_dirty(jl->j_commit_bh))
+			BUG();
+		mark_buffer_dirty(jl->j_commit_bh) ;
 		reiserfs_write_unlock(s);
-		wait_on_buffer(jl->j_commit_bh);
+		if (reiserfs_barrier_flush(s))
+			__sync_dirty_buffer(jl->j_commit_bh, WRITE_FLUSH_FUA);
+		else
+			sync_dirty_buffer(jl->j_commit_bh);
 		reiserfs_write_lock(s);
 	}
 
-	check_barrier_completion(s, jl->j_commit_bh);
-
 	/* If there was a write error in the journal - we can't commit this
 	 * transaction - it will be invalid and, if successful, will just end
 	 * up propagating the write error out to the filesystem. */
@@ -1319,26 +1264,15 @@ static int _update_journal_header_block(struct super_block *sb,
 		jh->j_first_unflushed_offset = cpu_to_le32(offset);
 		jh->j_mount_id = cpu_to_le32(journal->j_mount_id);
 
-		if (reiserfs_barrier_flush(sb)) {
-			int ret;
-			lock_buffer(journal->j_header_bh);
-			ret = submit_barrier_buffer(journal->j_header_bh);
-			if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP) {
-				set_buffer_uptodate(journal->j_header_bh);
-				disable_barrier(sb);
-				goto sync;
-			}
-			reiserfs_write_unlock(sb);
-			wait_on_buffer(journal->j_header_bh);
-			reiserfs_write_lock(sb);
-			check_barrier_completion(sb, journal->j_header_bh);
-		} else {
-		      sync:
-			set_buffer_dirty(journal->j_header_bh);
-			reiserfs_write_unlock(sb);
+		set_buffer_dirty(journal->j_header_bh);
+		reiserfs_write_unlock(sb);
+
+		if (reiserfs_barrier_flush(sb))
+			__sync_dirty_buffer(journal->j_header_bh, WRITE_FLUSH_FUA);
+		else
 			sync_dirty_buffer(journal->j_header_bh);
-			reiserfs_write_lock(sb);
-		}
+
+		reiserfs_write_lock(sb);
 		if (!buffer_uptodate(journal->j_header_bh)) {
 			reiserfs_warning(sb, "journal-837",
 					 "IO error during journal replay");
-- 
1.7.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-09-03 10:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-03 10:29 [PATCHSET #upstream] block, fs: replace HARDBARRIER with FLUSH/FUA, take#2 Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 01/41] ide: remove unnecessary blk_queue_flushing() test in do_ide_request() Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 02/41] block/loop: queue ordered mode should be DRAIN_FLUSH Tejun Heo
2010-09-12  8:38   ` Tao Ma
2010-09-12 11:41     ` Tejun Heo
2010-09-12 11:55       ` Tao Ma
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 03/41] block: kill QUEUE_ORDERED_BY_TAG Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 04/41] block: deprecate barrier and replace blk_queue_ordered() with blk_queue_flush() Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 05/41] block: remove spurious uses of REQ_HARDBARRIER Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 06/41] block: misc cleanups in barrier code Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 07/41] block: drop barrier ordering by queue draining Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 08/41] block: rename blk-barrier.c to blk-flush.c Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 09/41] block: rename barrier/ordered to flush Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 10/41] block: implement REQ_FLUSH/FUA based interface for FLUSH/FUA requests Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 11/41] block: filter flush bio's in __generic_make_request() Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 12/41] block: simplify queue_next_fseq Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 13/41] block: initialize flush request with WRITE_FLUSH instead of REQ_FLUSH Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 14/41] block: kick queue after sequencing REQ_FLUSH/FUA Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 15/41] block: make sure FSEQ_DATA request has the same rq_disk as the original Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 16/41] block: update documentation for REQ_FLUSH / REQ_FUA Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 17/41] block: use REQ_FLUSH in blkdev_issue_flush() Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 18/41] block/loop: implement REQ_FLUSH/FUA support Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 19/41] virtio_blk: drop REQ_HARDBARRIER support Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 20/41] lguest: replace VIRTIO_F_BARRIER support with VIRTIO_F_FLUSH support Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 21/41] md: implment REQ_FLUSH/FUA support Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 22/41] block: make __blk_rq_prep_clone() copy most command flags Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 23/41] dm: implement REQ_FLUSH/FUA support for bio-based dm Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 12:36   ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-06 11:14   ` [dm-devel] " Milan Broz
2010-09-07 21:17     ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-07 22:15       ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-07 23:49         ` [PATCH 42/41] dm: convey that all flushes are processed as empty Mike Snitzer
2010-09-08  0:00           ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-09-08  2:04             ` [PATCH 42/41 v2] " Mike Snitzer
2010-09-08 16:09               ` Tejun Heo
2010-09-08 16:09               ` Tejun Heo
2010-09-10 18:25   ` [PATCH 23/41] dm: implement REQ_FLUSH/FUA support for bio-based dm Mikulas Patocka
2010-09-10 18:46     ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-10 19:05       ` Mikulas Patocka
2010-09-10 19:24         ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-10 20:06           ` Mikulas Patocka
2010-09-10 23:36             ` Tejun Heo
2010-09-11  1:46               ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-18 17:58                 ` Bill Davidsen
2010-09-18 20:42                   ` [dm-devel] " Mike Snitzer
2010-09-11 12:19               ` Ric Wheeler
2010-09-13 19:01               ` Mikulas Patocka
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 24/41] dm: implement REQ_FLUSH/FUA support for request-based dm Tejun Heo
2010-09-08  1:46   ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 25/41] dm: relax ordering of bio-based flush implementation Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 26/41] dm: fix locking context in queue_io() Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 27/41] block: pass gfp_mask and flags to sb_issue_discard Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 28/41] xfs: replace barriers with explicit flush / FUA usage Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 29/41] btrfs: " Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 30/41] gfs2: " Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 32/41] nilfs2: " Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 33/41] jbd: " Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 34/41] jbd2: Modify ASYNC_COMMIT code to not rely on queue draining on barrier Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 35/41] jbd2: replace barriers with explicit flush / FUA usage Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 36/41] ext4: do not send discards as barriers Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 37/41] fat: " Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 38/41] swap: " Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 39/41] block: remove the WRITE_BARRIER flag Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 40/41] block: remove the BLKDEV_IFL_BARRIER flag Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 41/41] block: remove the BH_Eopnotsupp flag Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 18:53 ` [PATCHSET #upstream] block, fs: replace HARDBARRIER with FLUSH/FUA, take#2 Jens Axboe
2010-09-08 16:12 ` Tejun Heo
2010-09-10 10:19   ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1283509796-1510-32-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.co \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).