From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anders Larsen Subject: Re: Remaining BKL users, what to do Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 18:09:10 +0200 Message-ID: <1284653350l.20726l.1l@i-dmzi_al.realan.de> References: <201009161632.59210.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: codalist@coda.cs.cmu.edu, autofs@linux.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Christoph Hellwig , Mikulas Patocka , Trond Myklebust , Petr Vandrovec , Jan Kara , Evgeniy Dushistov , Ingo Molnar , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Samuel Ortiz , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Hendry To: Arnd Bergmann Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201009161632.59210.arnd@arndb.de> (from arnd@arndb.de on Thu Sep 16 16:32:59 2010) Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On 2010-09-16 16:32:59, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The big kernel lock is gone from almost all code in linux-next, this is > the status of what I think will happen to the remaining users: > fs/qnx4: > Should be easy to fix, there are only a few places in the code that > use the BKL. Anders? Will do. Cheers Anders