linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: sfrench@us.ibm.com, ffilz@us.ibm.com, agruen@suse.de,
	adilger@sun.com, sandeen@redhat.com, tytso@mit.edu,
	bfields@citi.umich.edu, jlayton@redhat.com
Cc: aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH -V4 04/11] vfs: Add generic IS_ACL() test for acl support
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:18:07 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1285332494-12756-5-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1285332494-12756-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de>

When IS_POSIXACL() is true, the vfs does not apply the umask.  Other acl
models will need the same exception, so introduce a separate IS_ACL()
test.

The IS_POSIX_ACL() test is still needed so that nfsd can determine when
the underlying file system supports POSIX ACLs (as opposed to some other
kind).

Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 fs/namei.c         |    6 +++---
 fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c  |    2 +-
 include/linux/fs.h |    8 +++++++-
 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
index bf822b8..855b360 100644
--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -1486,7 +1486,7 @@ static int __open_namei_create(struct nameidata *nd, struct path *path,
 	int error;
 	struct dentry *dir = nd->path.dentry;
 
-	if (!IS_POSIXACL(dir->d_inode))
+	if (!IS_ACL(dir->d_inode))
 		mode &= ~current_umask();
 	error = security_path_mknod(&nd->path, path->dentry, mode, 0);
 	if (error)
@@ -2009,7 +2009,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(mknodat, int, dfd, const char __user *, filename, int, mode,
 		error = PTR_ERR(dentry);
 		goto out_unlock;
 	}
-	if (!IS_POSIXACL(nd.path.dentry->d_inode))
+	if (!IS_ACL(nd.path.dentry->d_inode))
 		mode &= ~current_umask();
 	error = may_mknod(mode);
 	if (error)
@@ -2086,7 +2086,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(mkdirat, int, dfd, const char __user *, pathname, int, mode)
 	if (IS_ERR(dentry))
 		goto out_unlock;
 
-	if (!IS_POSIXACL(nd.path.dentry->d_inode))
+	if (!IS_ACL(nd.path.dentry->d_inode))
 		mode &= ~current_umask();
 	error = mnt_want_write(nd.path.mnt);
 	if (error)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index 089da5b..c77dbbf 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -2042,7 +2042,7 @@ nfs4_atomic_open(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, struct nameidata *nd)
 	if (nd->flags & LOOKUP_CREATE) {
 		attr.ia_mode = nd->intent.open.create_mode;
 		attr.ia_valid = ATTR_MODE;
-		if (!IS_POSIXACL(dir))
+		if (!IS_ACL(dir))
 			attr.ia_mode &= ~current_umask();
 	} else {
 		open_flags &= ~O_EXCL;
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 63d069b..485c697 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ struct inodes_stat_t {
 #define MS_VERBOSE	32768	/* War is peace. Verbosity is silence.
 				   MS_VERBOSE is deprecated. */
 #define MS_SILENT	32768
-#define MS_POSIXACL	(1<<16)	/* VFS does not apply the umask */
+#define MS_POSIXACL	(1<<16) /* Supports POSIX ACLs */
 #define MS_UNBINDABLE	(1<<17)	/* change to unbindable */
 #define MS_PRIVATE	(1<<18)	/* change to private */
 #define MS_SLAVE	(1<<19)	/* change to slave */
@@ -270,6 +270,12 @@ struct inodes_stat_t {
 #define IS_SWAPFILE(inode)	((inode)->i_flags & S_SWAPFILE)
 #define IS_PRIVATE(inode)	((inode)->i_flags & S_PRIVATE)
 
+/*
+ * IS_ACL() tells the VFS to not apply the umask
+ * and use iop->check_acl for acl permission checks when defined.
+ */
+#define IS_ACL(inode)		__IS_FLG(inode, MS_POSIXACL)
+
 /* the read-only stuff doesn't really belong here, but any other place is
    probably as bad and I don't want to create yet another include file. */
 
-- 
1.7.0.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-09-24 12:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-24 12:48 [PATCH -V4 00/11] New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 01/11] vfs: Indicate that the permission functions take all the MAY_* flags Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 02/11] vfs: Pass all mask flags down to iop->check_acl Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 03/11] vfs: Add a comment to inode_permission() Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 05/11] vfs: Add IS_RICHACL() test for richacl support Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 06/11] vfs: Optimize out IS_RICHACL() if CONFIG_FS_RICHACL is not defined Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 07/11] vfs: Make acl_permission_check() work for richacls Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 15:50   ` Jeff Layton
2010-09-24 18:55     ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-09-27 13:03       ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 08/11] vfs: Add new file and directory create permission flags Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 15:54   ` Jeff Layton
2010-09-24 19:16     ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-09-24 19:23       ` Jeff Layton
2010-09-27 13:14     ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2011-01-02 23:21       ` Ted Ts'o
2011-01-03  5:20         ` Andreas Dilger
2011-01-03  5:59           ` Andreas Dilger
2011-01-03 14:20         ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 09/11] vfs: Add delete child and delete self " Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 10/11] vfs: Make the inode passed to inode_change_ok non-const Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-09-24 12:48 ` [PATCH -V4 11/11] vfs: Add permission flags for setting file attributes Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-10-12  0:24 ` [PATCH -V4 00/11] New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-12  7:17   ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-10-12 15:35     ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-25 19:09       ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-10-26  4:35         ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-11-01 15:30           ` J. Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1285332494-12756-5-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=adilger@sun.com \
    --cc=agruen@suse.de \
    --cc=bfields@citi.umich.edu \
    --cc=ffilz@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nfsv4@linux-nfs.org \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=sfrench@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).