linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org,
	bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 19932] New: Getting lots of   name_count maxed, losing inode data  messages in /var/log/messages
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 17:42:28 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1286833348.28329.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101011143400.565facf5.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 14:34 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> (switched to email.  Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
> bugzilla web interface).
> 
> On Sat, 9 Oct 2010 06:58:14 GMT
> bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> 
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19932
> > 
> >            Summary: Getting lots of   name_count maxed, losing inode data
> >                     messages in /var/log/messages
> >            Product: Other
> >            Version: 2.5
> >     Kernel Version: 2.6.35.7
> >           Platform: All
> >         OS/Version: Linux
> >               Tree: Mainline
> >             Status: NEW
> >           Severity: normal
> >           Priority: P1
> >          Component: Other
> >         AssignedTo: other_other@kernel-bugs.osdl.org
> >         ReportedBy: jd1008@gmail.com
> >         Regression: No
> > 
> > 
> > This old problem was also reported in redhat in redhat bugzilla:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445757
> > in mid 2008.
> > 
> > 
> > The message is coming from kernel/auditsc.c in audit_inc_name_count():
> > 
> > 
> > static int audit_inc_name_count(struct audit_context *context,
> >                                 const struct inode *inode)
> > {
> >         if (context->name_count >= AUDIT_NAMES) {
> >                 if (inode)
> >                         printk(KERN_DEBUG "audit: name_count maxed, losing
> > inode data: "
> >                                "dev=%02x:%02x, inode=%lu\n",
> >                                MAJOR(inode->i_sb->s_dev),
> >                                MINOR(inode->i_sb->s_dev),
> >                                inode->i_ino);
> > 
> >                 else
> >                         printk(KERN_DEBUG "name_count maxed, losing inode
> > data\n");
> >                 return 1;
> >         }
> >         context->name_count++;
> > #if AUDIT_DEBUG
> >         context->ino_count++;
> > #endif
> >         return 0;
> > }
> > 
> > I wish the kernel would also dump the stack, and funcs param values into
> > /var/log/messages
> > so a user can take a look at the source and do some searching
> > for the cause of this.
> > 
> > Also, if you can advise on how I can rebuild the kernel so that 
> > it will drop into the debugger when this happens, would be a great
> > help.

The audit systems has a hard coded value of 20 for the number of
inodes/pathnames it will collect information about in a single syscall.
Loading modules (such as kvm) are known to create all sorts of entries
in debugfs which overflows audit's tracking.  I also know that mounting
nfs the first time can do it setting up rpcfs.

I fixed it in RHEL by just changing the static 20 to a dynamic list but
I don't think Al liked that solution for upstream and instead wanted to
find all of the places we were overrunning 20 (hell overrunning 5 is a
problem) and figure out how to stop them from overrunning (typically by
disabling audit was his thought)

I just haven't gotten back to it as they are harmless (if scary
sounding)

-Eric


      reply	other threads:[~2010-10-11 21:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-19932-10286@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2010-10-11 21:34 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 19932] New: Getting lots of name_count maxed, losing inode data messages in /var/log/messages Andrew Morton
2010-10-11 21:42   ` Eric Paris [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1286833348.28329.5.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
    --cc=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).