linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 17/19] fs: Reduce inode I_FREEING and factor inode disposal
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 19:14:11 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1287216853-17634-18-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1287216853-17634-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>

From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>

Inode reclaim can push many inodes into the I_FREEING state before
it actually frees them. During the time it gathers these inodes, it
can call iput(), invalidate_mapping_pages, be preempted, etc. As a
result, holding inodes in I_FREEING can cause pauses.

After the inode scalability work, there is not a big reason to batch
up inodes to reclaim them, so we can dispose them as they are found
from the LRU.

Unmount does a very similar reclaim process via invalidate_list(),
but currently uses the i_lru list to aggregate inodes for a batched
disposal. This requires taking the inode_lru_lock for every inode we
want to dispose. Instead, take the inodes off the superblock inode
list (as we already hold the lock) and use i_sb_list as the
aggregator for inodes to dispose to reduce lock traffic.

Further, iput_final() does the same inode cleanup as reclaim and
unmount, so convert them all to use a single function for destroying
inodes. This is written such that the callers can optimise list
removals to avoid unneccessary lock round trips when removing inodes
from lists.

Based on a patch originally from Nick Piggin.

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
---
 fs/inode.c |  109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
 1 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index 5cddf45..bea1657 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -32,6 +32,8 @@
  *
  * inode->i_lock is *always* the innermost lock.
  *
+ * inode->i_lock is *always* the innermost lock.
+ *
  * inode->i_lock protects:
  *   i_ref i_state
  * inode hash lock protects:
@@ -49,8 +51,8 @@
  *
  * sb inode lock
  *   inode_lru_lock
- *     wb->b_lock
- *       inode->i_lock
+ *   wb->b_lock
+ *     inode->i_lock
  *
  * wb->b_lock
  *   sb_lock (pin sb for writeback)
@@ -460,6 +462,44 @@ static void evict(struct inode *inode)
 }
 
 /*
+ * Free the inode passed in, removing it from the lists it is still connected
+ * to but avoiding unnecessary lock round-trips for the lists it is no longer
+ * on.
+ *
+ * An inode must already be marked I_FREEING so that we avoid the inode being
+ * moved back onto lists if we race with other code that manipulates the lists
+ * (e.g. writeback_single_inode). The caller
+ */
+static void dispose_one_inode(struct inode *inode)
+{
+	BUG_ON(!(inode->i_state & I_FREEING));
+
+	/*
+	 * move the inode off the IO lists and LRU once
+	 * I_FREEING is set so that it won't get moved back on
+	 * there if it is dirty.
+	 */
+	if (!list_empty(&inode->i_wb_list))
+		inode_wb_list_del(inode);
+
+	if (!list_empty(&inode->i_lru))
+		inode_lru_list_del(inode);
+
+	if (!list_empty(&inode->i_sb_list)) {
+		spin_lock(&inode->i_sb->s_inodes_lock);
+		list_del_init(&inode->i_sb_list);
+		spin_unlock(&inode->i_sb->s_inodes_lock);
+	}
+
+	evict(inode);
+
+	remove_inode_hash(inode);
+	wake_up_inode(inode);
+	BUG_ON(inode->i_state != (I_FREEING | I_CLEAR));
+	destroy_inode(inode);
+}
+
+/*
  * dispose_list - dispose of the contents of a local list
  * @head: the head of the list to free
  *
@@ -471,18 +511,10 @@ static void dispose_list(struct list_head *head)
 	while (!list_empty(head)) {
 		struct inode *inode;
 
-		inode = list_first_entry(head, struct inode, i_lru);
-		list_del_init(&inode->i_lru);
-
-		evict(inode);
-
-		remove_inode_hash(inode);
-		spin_lock(&inode->i_sb->s_inodes_lock);
+		inode = list_first_entry(head, struct inode, i_sb_list);
 		list_del_init(&inode->i_sb_list);
-		spin_unlock(&inode->i_sb->s_inodes_lock);
 
-		wake_up_inode(inode);
-		destroy_inode(inode);
+		dispose_one_inode(inode);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -523,17 +555,8 @@ static int invalidate_list(struct super_block *sb, struct list_head *head,
 			inode->i_state |= I_FREEING;
 			spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
 
-			/*
-			 * move the inode off the IO lists and LRU once
-			 * I_FREEING is set so that it won't get moved back on
-			 * there if it is dirty.
-			 */
-			inode_wb_list_del(inode);
-
-			spin_lock(&inode_lru_lock);
-			list_move(&inode->i_lru, dispose);
-			percpu_counter_dec(&nr_inodes_unused);
-			spin_unlock(&inode_lru_lock);
+			/* save a lock round trip by removing the inode here. */
+			list_move(&inode->i_sb_list, dispose);
 			continue;
 		}
 		spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
@@ -552,17 +575,17 @@ static int invalidate_list(struct super_block *sb, struct list_head *head,
  */
 int invalidate_inodes(struct super_block *sb)
 {
-	int busy;
 	LIST_HEAD(throw_away);
+	int busy;
 
 	down_write(&iprune_sem);
 	spin_lock(&sb->s_inodes_lock);
 	fsnotify_unmount_inodes(&sb->s_inodes);
 	busy = invalidate_list(sb, &sb->s_inodes, &throw_away);
 	spin_unlock(&sb->s_inodes_lock);
+	up_write(&iprune_sem);
 
 	dispose_list(&throw_away);
-	up_write(&iprune_sem);
 
 	return busy;
 }
@@ -600,7 +623,6 @@ static int can_unuse(struct inode *inode)
  */
 static void prune_icache(int nr_to_scan)
 {
-	LIST_HEAD(freeable);
 	int nr_scanned;
 	unsigned long reap = 0;
 
@@ -660,15 +682,15 @@ static void prune_icache(int nr_to_scan)
 		inode->i_state |= I_FREEING;
 		spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
 
-		/*
-		 * move the inode off the io lists and lru once
-		 * i_freeing is set so that it won't get moved back on
-		 * there if it is dirty.
-		 */
-		inode_wb_list_del(inode);
-
-		list_move(&inode->i_lru, &freeable);
+		/* save a lock round trip by removing the inode here. */
+		list_del_init(&inode->i_lru);
 		percpu_counter_dec(&nr_inodes_unused);
+		spin_unlock(&inode_lru_lock);
+
+		dispose_one_inode(inode);
+		cond_resched();
+
+		spin_lock(&inode_lru_lock);
 	}
 	if (current_is_kswapd())
 		__count_vm_events(KSWAPD_INODESTEAL, reap);
@@ -676,7 +698,6 @@ static void prune_icache(int nr_to_scan)
 		__count_vm_events(PGINODESTEAL, reap);
 	spin_unlock(&inode_lru_lock);
 
-	dispose_list(&freeable);
 	up_read(&iprune_sem);
 }
 
@@ -1461,23 +1482,7 @@ static void iput_final(struct inode *inode)
 	inode->i_state |= I_FREEING;
 	spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
 
-	/*
-	 * After we delete the inode from the LRU and IO lists here, we avoid
-	 * moving dirty inodes back onto the LRU now because I_FREEING is set
-	 * and hence writeback_single_inode() won't move the inode around.
-	 */
-	inode_wb_list_del(inode);
-	inode_lru_list_del(inode);
-
-	spin_lock(&sb->s_inodes_lock);
-	list_del_init(&inode->i_sb_list);
-	spin_unlock(&sb->s_inodes_lock);
-
-	evict(inode);
-	remove_inode_hash(inode);
-	wake_up_inode(inode);
-	BUG_ON(inode->i_state != (I_FREEING | I_CLEAR));
-	destroy_inode(inode);
+	dispose_one_inode(inode);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
1.7.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-10-16  8:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-16  8:13 Inode Lock Scalability V4 Dave Chinner
2010-10-16  8:13 ` [PATCH 01/19] fs: switch bdev inode bdi's correctly Dave Chinner
2010-10-16  9:30   ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-16 16:31   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-16  8:13 ` [PATCH 02/19] kernel: add bl_list Dave Chinner
2010-10-16  9:51   ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-16 16:32     ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-16  8:13 ` [PATCH 03/19] fs: Convert nr_inodes and nr_unused to per-cpu counters Dave Chinner
2010-10-16  8:29   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-16 10:04     ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-16 10:27       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-16 17:26         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-17  1:09           ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-17  1:12             ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-17  2:16               ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-16  8:13 ` [PATCH 04/19] fs: Implement lazy LRU updates for inodes Dave Chinner
2010-10-16  9:29   ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-16 16:59     ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-16 17:29       ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-16 17:34         ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-17  0:47           ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-17  0:47         ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-17  2:09           ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-17  1:53       ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-16  8:13 ` [PATCH 05/19] fs: inode split IO and LRU lists Dave Chinner
2010-10-16  8:14 ` [PATCH 06/19] fs: Clean up inode reference counting Dave Chinner
2010-10-16  8:14 ` [PATCH 07/19] exofs: use iput() for inode reference count decrements Dave Chinner
2010-10-16  8:14 ` [PATCH 08/19] fs: rework icount to be a locked variable Dave Chinner
2010-10-16  8:14 ` [PATCH 09/19] fs: Factor inode hash operations into functions Dave Chinner
2010-10-16  8:14 ` [PATCH 10/19] fs: Introduce per-bucket inode hash locks Dave Chinner
2010-10-16  8:14 ` [PATCH 11/19] fs: add a per-superblock lock for the inode list Dave Chinner
2010-10-16  8:14 ` [PATCH 12/19] fs: split locking of inode writeback and LRU lists Dave Chinner
2010-10-16  8:14 ` [PATCH 13/19] fs: Protect inode->i_state with the inode->i_lock Dave Chinner
2010-10-16  8:14 ` [PATCH 14/19] fs: introduce a per-cpu last_ino allocator Dave Chinner
2010-10-16  8:14 ` [PATCH 15/19] fs: Make iunique independent of inode_lock Dave Chinner
2010-10-16  8:14 ` [PATCH 16/19] fs: icache remove inode_lock Dave Chinner
2010-10-16  8:14 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2010-10-17  1:30   ` [PATCH 17/19] fs: Reduce inode I_FREEING and factor inode disposal Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-17  2:49     ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-17  4:13       ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-17  4:35         ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-17  5:13           ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-17  6:52             ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-17  7:05               ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-17 23:39                 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-18 21:27               ` Sage Weil
2010-10-19  3:54                 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-16  8:14 ` [PATCH 18/19] fs: split __inode_add_to_list Dave Chinner
2010-10-16  8:14 ` [PATCH 19/19] fs: do not assign default i_ino in new_inode Dave Chinner
2010-10-16  9:09   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-16 16:35     ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-18  9:11       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-18 14:48         ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-16 17:55 ` Inode Lock Scalability V4 Nick Piggin
2010-10-17  2:47   ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-17  2:55     ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-17  2:57       ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-17  6:10       ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-17  6:34         ` Nick Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1287216853-17634-18-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).