linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: A question on block_prepare_write()
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 03:00:46 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1287856846.1681.58.camel@leonhard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101023104036.2bec05a0.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

2010-10-23 (토), 10:40 -0700, Andrew Morton:
> On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 22:44:42 +0900 Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I see block_prepare_write() has local variable wait[2] to keep track of
> > buffer_heads which are not up-to-date. But I'm wondering how it could be
> > guaranteed there will be no more than 2 such buffer_heads? Is there any
> > restriction on the usage of the function? Using MAX_BUF_PER_PAGE instead
> > of the magic number 2 is just useless? I couldn't find any comments or
> > documentation on this.
> > 
> > Any of your comments would be greatly appreciated. TIA. :-)
> > 
> 
> block_prepare_write() may need to preread any buffer_head which are
> being only partially modified by the write().
> 
> Buffers which aren't being modified at all don't need to be preread. 
> Buffers which are being fully modified don't need to be preread
> (because all their data is being overwritten).
> 
> page:                      |-----------------------|
> buffer_heads:              |-----|-----|-----|-----|
> area we're writing to:               |---------|
> 
> There can only be a maximum of two partially-modified buffers in the page.

I see. It considers both edges of the to-be-written data. Thanks for
your clear and kindly explanation. :-)


-- 
Regards,
Namhyung Kim


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

      reply	other threads:[~2010-10-23 18:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-23 13:44 A question on block_prepare_write() Namhyung Kim
2010-10-23 17:40 ` Andrew Morton
2010-10-23 18:00   ` Namhyung Kim [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1287856846.1681.58.camel@leonhard \
    --to=namhyung@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).