From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Davidlohr Bueso Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] fs: remove inode_lock from iput_final and prune_icache Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 03:09:22 -0300 Message-ID: <1288159762.1985.5.camel@cowboy> References: <1288153384-8878-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1288153384-8878-5-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <20101027044038.GE19804@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <1288154866.2652.84.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20101027052520.GF19804@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <1288158623.2652.161.camel@edumazet-laptop> Reply-To: dave@gnu.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Al Viro , Dave Chinner , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1288158623.2652.161.camel@edumazet-laptop> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 07:50 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: > Le mercredi 27 octobre 2010 =C3=A0 06:25 +0100, Al Viro a =C3=A9crit = : > > "i\xe1\xb9\x89ode_lock", i.e. 'n' turned into U+1E49, aka "latin sm= all letter > > n with line below". I doubt that it's MTA braindamage. > >=20 > > In the first patch there's=20 > >=20 > > - * invalidate_inodes - attempt to free all inodes on a > > + * nvalidate_inodes - attempt to free all inodes on a > >=20 > > and I _really_ doubt that anything in mail system is capable of som= ething > > that elaborate. >=20 > Again, I can not see it in my copy, I checked lkml archives too : >=20 Neither can I, the patch is good (from a character point of view).