From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/8] fs: factor inode disposal
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:23:34 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1288322620-8566-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1288322620-8566-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
We have a couple of places that dispose of inodes. factor the
disposal into evict() to isolate this code and make it simpler to
peel away the inode_lock from the code.
While doing this, change the logic flow in iput_final() to separate
the different cases that need to be handled to make the transitions
the inode goes through more obvious.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
---
fs/inode.c | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
1 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index 4c84acb..2e218ac 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -399,17 +399,6 @@ void __insert_inode_hash(struct inode *inode, unsigned long hashval)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__insert_inode_hash);
/**
- * __remove_inode_hash - remove an inode from the hash
- * @inode: inode to unhash
- *
- * Remove an inode from the superblock.
- */
-static void __remove_inode_hash(struct inode *inode)
-{
- hlist_del_init(&inode->i_hash);
-}
-
-/**
* remove_inode_hash - remove an inode from the hash
* @inode: inode to unhash
*
@@ -437,10 +426,31 @@ void end_writeback(struct inode *inode)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(end_writeback);
+/*
+ * Free the inode passed in, removing it from the lists it is still connected
+ * to. We remove any pages still attached to the inode and wait for any IO that
+ * is still in progress before finally destroying the inode.
+ *
+ * An inode must already be marked I_FREEING so that we avoid the inode being
+ * moved back onto lists if we race with other code that manipulates the lists
+ * (e.g. writeback_single_inode). The caller is responsible for setting this.
+ *
+ * An inode must already be removed from the LRU list before being evicted from
+ * the cache. This should occur atomically with setting the I_FREEING state
+ * flag, so no inodes here should ever be on the LRU.
+ */
static void evict(struct inode *inode)
{
const struct super_operations *op = inode->i_sb->s_op;
+ BUG_ON(!(inode->i_state & I_FREEING));
+ BUG_ON(!list_empty(&inode->i_lru));
+
+ spin_lock(&inode_lock);
+ list_del_init(&inode->i_wb_list);
+ __inode_sb_list_del(inode);
+ spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
+
if (op->evict_inode) {
op->evict_inode(inode);
} else {
@@ -452,6 +462,15 @@ static void evict(struct inode *inode)
bd_forget(inode);
if (S_ISCHR(inode->i_mode) && inode->i_cdev)
cd_forget(inode);
+
+ remove_inode_hash(inode);
+
+ spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
+ wake_up_bit(&inode->i_state, __I_NEW);
+ BUG_ON(inode->i_state != (I_FREEING | I_CLEAR));
+ spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
+
+ destroy_inode(inode);
}
/*
@@ -470,16 +489,6 @@ static void dispose_list(struct list_head *head)
list_del_init(&inode->i_lru);
evict(inode);
-
- spin_lock(&inode_lock);
- __remove_inode_hash(inode);
- __inode_sb_list_del(inode);
- spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
-
- spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
- wake_up_bit(&inode->i_state, __I_NEW);
- spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
- destroy_inode(inode);
}
}
@@ -517,11 +526,10 @@ void evict_inodes(struct super_block *sb)
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
/*
- * Move the inode off the IO lists and LRU once I_FREEING is
- * set so that it won't get moved back on there if it is dirty.
+ * Move the inode off the LRU once I_FREEING is set so that it
+ * won't get moved back on.
*/
list_move(&inode->i_lru, &dispose);
- list_del_init(&inode->i_wb_list);
}
spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
@@ -563,11 +571,10 @@ int invalidate_inodes(struct super_block *sb)
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
/*
- * Move the inode off the IO lists and LRU once I_FREEING is
- * set so that it won't get moved back on there if it is dirty.
+ * Move the inode off the LRU once I_FREEING is
+ * set so that it won't get moved back on.
*/
list_move(&inode->i_lru, &dispose);
- list_del_init(&inode->i_wb_list);
}
spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
@@ -666,11 +673,10 @@ static void prune_icache(int nr_to_scan)
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
/*
- * Move the inode off the IO lists and LRU once I_FREEING is
- * set so that it won't get moved back on there if it is dirty.
+ * Move the inode off the LRU once I_FREEING is
+ * set so that it won't get moved back on.
*/
list_move(&inode->i_lru, &freeable);
- list_del_init(&inode->i_wb_list);
percpu_counter_dec(&nr_inodes_unused);
}
if (current_is_kswapd())
@@ -1401,16 +1407,16 @@ static void iput_final(struct inode *inode)
else
drop = generic_drop_inode(inode);
+ if (!drop && (sb->s_flags & MS_ACTIVE)) {
+ inode->i_state |= I_REFERENCED;
+ if (!(inode->i_state & (I_DIRTY|I_SYNC)))
+ inode_lru_list_add(inode);
+ spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
+ return;
+ }
+
if (!drop) {
- if (sb->s_flags & MS_ACTIVE) {
- inode->i_state |= I_REFERENCED;
- if (!(inode->i_state & (I_DIRTY|I_SYNC))) {
- inode_lru_list_add(inode);
- }
- spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
- spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
- return;
- }
inode->i_state |= I_WILL_FREE;
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
@@ -1419,28 +1425,14 @@ static void iput_final(struct inode *inode)
spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
WARN_ON(inode->i_state & I_NEW);
inode->i_state &= ~I_WILL_FREE;
- __remove_inode_hash(inode);
}
inode->i_state |= I_FREEING;
- spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
-
- /*
- * Move the inode off the IO lists and LRU once I_FREEING is
- * set so that it won't get moved back on there if it is dirty.
- */
inode_lru_list_del(inode);
- list_del_init(&inode->i_wb_list);
-
- __inode_sb_list_del(inode);
+ spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
+
evict(inode);
- remove_inode_hash(inode);
- spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
- wake_up_bit(&inode->i_state, __I_NEW);
- BUG_ON(inode->i_state != (I_FREEING | I_CLEAR));
- spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
- destroy_inode(inode);
}
/**
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-29 3:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-29 3:23 fs: break out inode operations from inode_lock V3 Dave Chinner
2010-10-29 3:23 ` [PATCH 1/8] fs: protect inode->i_state with inode->i_lock Dave Chinner
2010-10-29 4:29 ` Al Viro
2010-10-29 3:23 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2010-10-29 4:45 ` [PATCH 2/8] fs: factor inode disposal Al Viro
2010-10-29 3:23 ` [PATCH 3/8] fs: Lock the inode LRU list separately Dave Chinner
2010-10-29 3:23 ` [PATCH 4/8] fs: remove inode_lock from iput_final and prune_icache Dave Chinner
2010-10-29 5:14 ` Al Viro
2010-10-29 3:23 ` [PATCH 5/8] fs: move i_sb_list out from under inode_lock Dave Chinner
2010-10-29 3:23 ` [PATCH 6/8] fs: move i_wb_list " Dave Chinner
2010-10-29 3:23 ` [PATCH 7/8] fs: rename inode_lock to inode_hash_lock Dave Chinner
2010-10-29 3:23 ` [PATCH 8/8] fs: Clean up documentation references to inode_lock Dave Chinner
2010-10-29 5:17 ` Al Viro
2010-10-29 7:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-10-29 8:59 fs: break out inode operations from inode_lock V4 Dave Chinner
2010-10-29 8:59 ` [PATCH 2/8] fs: factor inode disposal Dave Chinner
2011-03-22 11:23 vfs: inode lock breakup Dave Chinner
2011-03-22 11:23 ` [PATCH 2/8] fs: factor inode disposal Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1288322620-8566-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).