From: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1.2 0/5] IMA: making i_readcount a first class inode citizen
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 14:03:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1288721009.3047.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1288717707-5295-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 13:08 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Changelog:
> - renamed iget/iput_readcount to i_readcount_inc/dec (Dave Chinner's suggestion)
> - finished cleaning up the locking, so that: (based on Eric's comment.)
> - i_lock is not required
> - i_mutex is taken when making measurement decisions to prevent
> file metadata(eg. permissions, xattr) changing from under it.
> - iint->mutex is taken when accessing/modifying the iint structure.
> - Based on the previous posting discussion, i_readcount is now defined as
> atomic.
>
> This patchset separates the incrementing/decrementing of the i_readcount,
> in the VFS layer, from other IMA functionality, by replacing the current
> ima_counts_get() call with i_readcount_inc(). Its unclear whether this
> call to increment i_readcount should be made earlier, like i_writecount.
>
> The patch ordering is a bit redundant in order to leave removing the ifdef
> around i_readcount until the last patch. The first four patches: redefines
> i_readcount as atomic, defines i_readcount_inc/dec(), moves the IMA
> functionality in ima_counts_get() to ima_file_check(), and removes the
> IMA imbalance code, simplifying IMA. The last patch removes the ifdef
> around i_readcount, making i_readcount into a "first class inode citizen".
>
> The generic_setlease code could then take advantage of i_readcount.
>
> Mimi
> Mimi Zohar (5):
> IMA: convert i_readcount to atomic
> IMA: define readcount functions
> IMA: maintain i_readcount in the VFS layer
> IMA: remove IMA imbalance checking
> IMA: making i_readcount a first class inode citizen
Ack on patches 1-4. Patch 5 I'm not so sure about. As long as IMA is
the only user I don't think we really want to unconditionally compile
i_readcount in. I say we either leave it wrapped in CONFIG_IMA until
there is a second user. Then we either unconditionally compile it in,
or we wrap it in something that either user can select in the Kconfig.
I'll let others voice their opinion.
-Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-02 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-02 17:08 [PATCH v1.2 0/5] IMA: making i_readcount a first class inode citizen Mimi Zohar
2010-11-02 17:08 ` [PATCH v1.2 1/5] IMA: convert i_readcount to atomic Mimi Zohar
2010-11-02 17:08 ` [PATCH v1.2 2/5] IMA: define readcount functions Mimi Zohar
2010-11-02 17:08 ` [PATCH v1.2 3/5] IMA: maintain i_readcount in the VFS layer Mimi Zohar
2010-11-02 17:08 ` [PATCH v1.2 4/5] IMA: remove IMA imbalance checking Mimi Zohar
2010-11-02 17:08 ` [PATCH v1.2 5/5] IMA: making i_readcount a first class inode citizen Mimi Zohar
2010-11-02 18:03 ` Eric Paris [this message]
2010-11-05 16:35 ` [PATCH v1.2 0/5] " J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1288721009.3047.16.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).