From: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
To: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
sds@tycho.nsa.gov, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: call security_d_instantiate in d_obtain_alias
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 13:54:08 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1290020048.14282.81.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1290016263-1637-1-git-send-email-josef@redhat.com>
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 12:51 -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> While trying to track down some NFS problems with BTRFS, I kept noticing I was
> getting -EACCESS for no apparent reason. Eric Paris and printk() helped me
> figure out that it was SELinux that was giving me grief, with the following
> denial
>
> type=AVC msg=audit(1290013638.413:95): avc: denied { 0x800000 } for pid=1772
> comm="nfsd" name="" dev=sda1 ino=256 scontext=system_u:system_r:kernel_t:s0
> tcontext=system_u:object_r:unlabeled_t:s0 tclass=file
>
> Turns out this is because in d_obtain_alias if we can't find an alias we create
> one and do all the normal instantiation stuff, but we don't do the
> security_d_instantiate. With this patch I'm no longer seeing these errant
> -EACCESS return values. Thanks,
>
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Adding a couple of people to the CC just to make sure they notice this
patch.
-Eric
> ---
> fs/dcache.c | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
> index 23702a9..890a59e 100644
> --- a/fs/dcache.c
> +++ b/fs/dcache.c
> @@ -1201,6 +1201,7 @@ struct dentry *d_obtain_alias(struct inode *inode)
> spin_unlock(&tmp->d_lock);
>
> spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
> + security_d_instantiate(tmp, inode);
> return tmp;
>
> out_iput:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-17 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-17 17:51 [PATCH] fs: call security_d_instantiate in d_obtain_alias Josef Bacik
2010-11-17 18:54 ` Eric Paris [this message]
2010-11-17 19:18 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-11-17 19:28 ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-17 20:26 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-11-17 22:12 ` Eric Paris
2010-11-18 1:43 ` Josef Bacik
2010-11-19 5:28 ` David Quigley
2010-11-19 16:42 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-11-20 16:38 ` Dave Quigley
2010-11-29 20:23 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-11-17 20:27 ` Josef Bacik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1290020048.14282.81.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=josef@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).