From: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@sophos.com>
Cc: Alexey Zaytsev <alexey.zaytsev@gmail.com>,
Scott Hassan <hassan@dotfunk.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
"agruen@linbit.com" <agruen@linbit.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"stefan@buettcher.org" <stefan@buettcher.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] fanotify: Expose the file changes to the user
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:14:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1291047294.3248.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201011261011.55266.tvrtko.ursulin@sophos.com>
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 10:11 +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> On Monday 22 Nov 2010 00:37:21 Alexey Zaytsev wrote:
> > struct fanotify_event_metadata {
> > - __u16 event_len;
> > + __u16 event_len; /* Including the options */
> > __u8 vers;
> > - __u8 reserved;
> > + __u8 options_offset; /* Aka header length */
> > __s32 fd;
> > __aligned_u64 mask;
> > __s32 pid;
> > + /* Options go here. */
> > };
> Also, options_offset is, if I understood it correctly, basically the lenght of
> fanotify_event_metadata. As such, isn't that field redundant since the lenght
> is implied from the protocol version?
Ok, the way I envision the interface is the fanotify_event_metadata is
going to be information that is common for all event types. If a
particular event type (in the case being brought forth MODIFY and
CLOSE_WRITE) needs more information it will use the optional headers.
I'd still like to be able to add generic info, ex: the uid of the
requesting process, to the generic event metadata. We might also
someday want to use the optional headers for things like the inotify
move cookie. Why waste space in every event when only the move type
events cared about this cookie?
This necessitates options_offset. Lets say I compile my userspace app
as version 3. I know that fanotify_event_metadata is 14 bytes long in
version 3. Thus I start looking at byte 15 for the first optional
header. But the kernel is version 4 and fanotify_event_metadata is
actually 18 bytes long. Whoops, userspace should be looking at byte 19
for the header but accidentally looked at byte 15. options_offset will
allow a version 3 userspace to run on a version 4 kernel while skipping
bytes 15-18 which it doesn't understand.
At the end of all of this discussion what did people finally agree on?
Something like this?
struct fanotify_opt_hdr {
__u16 type;
__u16 len;
/* Payload goes here. */
};
struct fanotify_event_metadata {
__u32 event_len; /* Including the options */
__u16 vers;
__u16 options_offset; /* Aka header length */
__s32 fd;
__aligned_u64 mask;
__s32 pid;
/* Options go here. */
};
We could be ABI compatible if we let vers as a __u32 and added
options_offset at the end of the structure... Do we have strong
feelings on either side about maintaining compatibility or about
structure lengths?
-Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-29 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-22 0:31 [PATCH 0/4] Series short description Alexey Zaytsev
2010-11-22 0:33 ` [PATCH 1/4] fanotify: Shrink struct fanotify_event_metadata by 32 bits Alexey Zaytsev
2010-11-26 7:01 ` Alexey Zaytsev
2010-11-22 0:33 ` [PATCH 2/4] VFS: Tell fsnotify what part of the file might have changed Alexey Zaytsev
2010-11-22 0:33 ` [PATCH 3/4] fsnotify: Handle the file change ranges Alexey Zaytsev
2010-11-22 0:37 ` [PATCH 4/4] fanotify: Expose the file changes to the user Alexey Zaytsev
2010-11-26 10:11 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2010-11-26 11:21 ` Alexey Zaytsev
2010-11-26 11:41 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2010-11-26 12:11 ` Alexey Zaytsev
2010-11-29 16:14 ` Eric Paris [this message]
2010-11-29 16:51 ` Alexey Zaytsev
2010-11-29 18:14 ` Eric Paris
2010-11-29 17:11 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1291047294.3248.9.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=agruen@linbit.com \
--cc=alexey.zaytsev@gmail.com \
--cc=hassan@dotfunk.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefan@buettcher.org \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@sophos.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).