From: Harsh Prateek Bora <harsh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, fengguang.wu@intel.com,
kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com
Cc: aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jvrao@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
Harsh Prateek Bora <harsh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Typecasting required for comparing unlike datatypes
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 18:25:00 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1291812900-18311-1-git-send-email-harsh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
The existing code causes the if condition to pass when it should fail
on a *64-bit kernel* because of implicit data type conversions. It can
be observed by passing pos = -1 and count = some positive number.
This results in function returning EOVERFLOW instead of EINVAL.
With this patch, the function returns EINVAL when pos is -1 and count
is a positive number. This can be tested by calling sendfile with
offset = -1 and count = some positive number on a 64-bit kernel.
Signed-off-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harsh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
fs/read_write.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c
index 431a0ed..a8eabd4 100644
--- a/fs/read_write.c
+++ b/fs/read_write.c
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ __negative_fpos_check(struct file *file, loff_t pos, size_t count)
* pos or pos+count is negative here, check overflow.
* too big "count" will be caught in rw_verify_area().
*/
- if ((pos < 0) && (pos + count < pos))
+ if ((pos < 0) && ( (loff_t) (pos + count) < pos))
return -EOVERFLOW;
if (file->f_mode & FMODE_UNSIGNED_OFFSET)
return 0;
--
1.7.1.1
next reply other threads:[~2010-12-08 12:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-08 12:55 Harsh Prateek Bora [this message]
2010-12-09 18:32 ` [PATCH] Typecasting required for comparing unlike datatypes Harsh Bora
2010-12-10 0:06 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-12-10 0:53 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-12-10 6:39 ` Harsh Bora
2010-12-10 7:01 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-12-10 7:18 ` Harsh Bora
2010-12-10 7:59 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-12-10 8:13 ` Harsh Bora
2010-12-10 8:20 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-12-10 8:18 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-12-10 8:31 ` Harsh Bora
2010-12-15 9:50 ` Al Viro
2010-12-16 0:24 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-12-19 7:02 ` Harsh Bora
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1291812900-18311-1-git-send-email-harsh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=harsh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=jvrao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).