linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
To: "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>,
	"Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Subject: more dput lock contentions in 2.6.38-rc?
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 08:35:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1295915725.1949.967.camel@sli10-conroe> (raw)

Hi,
we are testing dbench benchmark and see big drop of 2.6.38-rc compared
to 2.6.37 in several machines with 2 sockets or 4 sockets. We have 12
disks mount to /mnt/stp/dbenchdata/sd*/ and dbench runs against data of
the disks. According to perf, we saw more lock contentions:
In 2.6.37: 13.00%        dbench  [kernel.kallsyms]   [k] _raw_spin_lock
In 2.6.38-rc: 69.45%        dbench  [kernel.kallsyms]   [k]_raw_spin_lock
-     69.45%        dbench  [kernel.kallsyms]   [k] _raw_spin_lock
   - _raw_spin_lock
      - 48.41% dput
         - 61.17% path_put
            - 60.47% do_path_lookup
               + 53.18% user_path_at
               + 42.13% do_filp_open
               + 4.69% user_path_parent
            - 35.56% d_path
                 seq_path
                 show_vfsmnt
                 seq_read
                 vfs_read
                 sys_read
                 system_call_fastpath
                 __GI___libc_read
            + 2.17% do_filp_open
            + 1.72% mounts_release
         + 38.69% link_path_walk
      + 30.21% path_get
      + 19.08% nameidata_drop_rcu
      + 0.83% __d_lookup
it appears there are heavy lock contention when dput release '/', 'mnt',
'stp', 'dbenchdata' and 'proc' when dbench is running.

Thanks,
Shaohua

             reply	other threads:[~2011-01-25  0:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-25  0:35 Shaohua Li [this message]
2011-01-25  1:04 ` more dput lock contentions in 2.6.38-rc? Nick Piggin
2011-01-25  1:11   ` Shaohua Li
2011-01-25  1:26     ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-25  1:34       ` Shaohua Li
2011-01-25  1:44         ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-25  2:01           ` Shaohua Li
2011-01-25  2:09             ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-25  2:46               ` Shaohua Li
2011-01-25  3:04                 ` Nick Piggin
2011-02-23  3:26         ` Shaohua Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1295915725.1949.967.camel@sli10-conroe \
    --to=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).