From: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
To: "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>,
"Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Subject: more dput lock contentions in 2.6.38-rc?
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 08:35:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1295915725.1949.967.camel@sli10-conroe> (raw)
Hi,
we are testing dbench benchmark and see big drop of 2.6.38-rc compared
to 2.6.37 in several machines with 2 sockets or 4 sockets. We have 12
disks mount to /mnt/stp/dbenchdata/sd*/ and dbench runs against data of
the disks. According to perf, we saw more lock contentions:
In 2.6.37: 13.00% dbench [kernel.kallsyms] [k] _raw_spin_lock
In 2.6.38-rc: 69.45% dbench [kernel.kallsyms] [k]_raw_spin_lock
- 69.45% dbench [kernel.kallsyms] [k] _raw_spin_lock
- _raw_spin_lock
- 48.41% dput
- 61.17% path_put
- 60.47% do_path_lookup
+ 53.18% user_path_at
+ 42.13% do_filp_open
+ 4.69% user_path_parent
- 35.56% d_path
seq_path
show_vfsmnt
seq_read
vfs_read
sys_read
system_call_fastpath
__GI___libc_read
+ 2.17% do_filp_open
+ 1.72% mounts_release
+ 38.69% link_path_walk
+ 30.21% path_get
+ 19.08% nameidata_drop_rcu
+ 0.83% __d_lookup
it appears there are heavy lock contention when dput release '/', 'mnt',
'stp', 'dbenchdata' and 'proc' when dbench is running.
Thanks,
Shaohua
next reply other threads:[~2011-01-25 0:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-25 0:35 Shaohua Li [this message]
2011-01-25 1:04 ` more dput lock contentions in 2.6.38-rc? Nick Piggin
2011-01-25 1:11 ` Shaohua Li
2011-01-25 1:26 ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-25 1:34 ` Shaohua Li
2011-01-25 1:44 ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-25 2:01 ` Shaohua Li
2011-01-25 2:09 ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-25 2:46 ` Shaohua Li
2011-01-25 3:04 ` Nick Piggin
2011-02-23 3:26 ` Shaohua Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1295915725.1949.967.camel@sli10-conroe \
--to=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).