linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>,
	"Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: more dput lock contentions in 2.6.38-rc?
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 11:26:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1298431572.19589.1.camel@sli10-conroe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1295919258.1949.973.camel@sli10-conroe>

On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 09:34 +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 09:26 +0800, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 09:04 +0800, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> wrote:
> > >> > Hi,
> > >> > we are testing dbench benchmark and see big drop of 2.6.38-rc compared
> > >> > to 2.6.37 in several machines with 2 sockets or 4 sockets. We have 12
> > >> > disks mount to /mnt/stp/dbenchdata/sd*/ and dbench runs against data of
> > >> > the disks. According to perf, we saw more lock contentions:
> > >> > In 2.6.37: 13.00%        dbench  [kernel.kallsyms]   [k] _raw_spin_lock
> > >> > In 2.6.38-rc: 69.45%        dbench  [kernel.kallsyms]   [k]_raw_spin_lock
> > >> > -     69.45%        dbench  [kernel.kallsyms]   [k] _raw_spin_lock
> > >> >   - _raw_spin_lock
> > >> >      - 48.41% dput
> > >> >         - 61.17% path_put
> > >> >            - 60.47% do_path_lookup
> > >> >               + 53.18% user_path_at
> > >> >               + 42.13% do_filp_open
> > >> >               + 4.69% user_path_parent
> > >>
> > >> What filesystems are mounted on the path?
> > > ext3 or ext4
> > 
> > ext3 or 4 along every step of the path? Are there
> > any acls loaded, or security policy running?
> all disks are formated with the same fs, just some machines use ext3 and
> others ext4. no we don't have acl or security policy.
> > It may be possible that they're all coming from
> > /proc/ access.
> I added trace in dput just after the lock taken. and most files are '/',
> 'mnt', 'stp'. the percentage of 'proc' is small actually.
Hi Nick,
Anything I can test for this issue?

Thanks,
Shaohua

      parent reply	other threads:[~2011-02-23  3:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-25  0:35 more dput lock contentions in 2.6.38-rc? Shaohua Li
2011-01-25  1:04 ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-25  1:11   ` Shaohua Li
2011-01-25  1:26     ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-25  1:34       ` Shaohua Li
2011-01-25  1:44         ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-25  2:01           ` Shaohua Li
2011-01-25  2:09             ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-25  2:46               ` Shaohua Li
2011-01-25  3:04                 ` Nick Piggin
2011-02-23  3:26         ` Shaohua Li [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1298431572.19589.1.camel@sli10-conroe \
    --to=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).