From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: sfrench@us.ibm.com, agruen@linbit.com, dilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
sandeen@redhat.com, tytso@mit.edu, bfields@fieldses.org,
jlayton@redhat.com
Cc: aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH -V5 13/24] richacl: Permission mapping functions
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:22:00 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1298469131-16555-14-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1298469131-16555-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de>
We need to map from POSIX permissions to NFSv4 permissions when a
chmod() is done, from NFSv4 permissions to POSIX permissions when an acl
is set (which implicitly sets the file permission bits), and from the
MAY_READ/MAY_WRITE/MAY_EXEC/MAY_APPEND flags to NFSv4 permissions when
doing an access check in a richacl.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
fs/richacl_base.c | 118 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/richacl.h | 46 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 164 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/richacl_base.c b/fs/richacl_base.c
index 99ed0ca..50ba645 100644
--- a/fs/richacl_base.c
+++ b/fs/richacl_base.c
@@ -69,6 +69,124 @@ richacl_clone(const struct richacl *acl)
}
/**
+ * richacl_mask_to_mode - compute the file permission bits which correspond to @mask
+ * @mask: %ACE4_* permission mask
+ *
+ * See richacl_masks_to_mode().
+ */
+static int
+richacl_mask_to_mode(unsigned int mask)
+{
+ int mode = 0;
+
+ if (mask & ACE4_POSIX_MODE_READ)
+ mode |= MAY_READ;
+ if (mask & ACE4_POSIX_MODE_WRITE)
+ mode |= MAY_WRITE;
+ if (mask & ACE4_POSIX_MODE_EXEC)
+ mode |= MAY_EXEC;
+
+ return mode;
+}
+
+/**
+ * richacl_masks_to_mode - compute the file permission bits from the file masks
+ *
+ * When setting a richacl, we set the file permission bits to indicate maximum
+ * permissions: for example, we set the Write permission when a mask contains
+ * ACE4_APPEND_DATA even if it does not also contain ACE4_WRITE_DATA.
+ *
+ * Permissions which are not in ACE4_POSIX_MODE_READ, ACE4_POSIX_MODE_WRITE, or
+ * ACE4_POSIX_MODE_EXEC cannot be represented in the file permission bits.
+ * Such permissions can still be effective, but not for new files or after a
+ * chmod(), and only if they were set explicitly, for example, by setting a
+ * richacl.
+ */
+int
+richacl_masks_to_mode(const struct richacl *acl)
+{
+ return richacl_mask_to_mode(acl->a_owner_mask) << 6 |
+ richacl_mask_to_mode(acl->a_group_mask) << 3 |
+ richacl_mask_to_mode(acl->a_other_mask);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(richacl_masks_to_mode);
+
+/**
+ * richacl_mode_to_mask - compute a file mask from the lowest three mode bits
+ *
+ * When the file permission bits of a file are set with chmod(), this specifies
+ * the maximum permissions that processes will get. All permissions beyond
+ * that will be removed from the file masks, and become ineffective.
+ *
+ * We also add in the permissions which are always allowed no matter what the
+ * acl says.
+ */
+unsigned int
+richacl_mode_to_mask(mode_t mode)
+{
+ unsigned int mask = ACE4_POSIX_ALWAYS_ALLOWED;
+
+ if (mode & MAY_READ)
+ mask |= ACE4_POSIX_MODE_READ;
+ if (mode & MAY_WRITE)
+ mask |= ACE4_POSIX_MODE_WRITE;
+ if (mode & MAY_EXEC)
+ mask |= ACE4_POSIX_MODE_EXEC;
+
+ return mask;
+}
+
+/**
+ * richacl_want_to_mask - convert the iop->permission want argument to a mask
+ * @want: @want argument of the permission inode operation
+ *
+ * When checking for append, @want is (MAY_WRITE | MAY_APPEND).
+ *
+ * Richacls use the iop->may_create and iop->may_delete hooks which are
+ * used for checking if creating and deleting files is allowed. These hooks do
+ * not use richacl_want_to_mask(), so we do not have to deal with mapping
+ * MAY_WRITE to ACE4_ADD_FILE, ACE4_ADD_SUBDIRECTORY, and ACE4_DELETE_CHILD
+ * here.
+ */
+unsigned int
+richacl_want_to_mask(int want)
+{
+ unsigned int mask = 0;
+
+ if (want & MAY_READ)
+ mask |= ACE4_READ_DATA;
+ if (want & (MAY_APPEND |
+ MAY_CREATE_FILE | MAY_CREATE_DIR |
+ MAY_DELETE_CHILD | MAY_DELETE_SELF |
+ MAY_TAKE_OWNERSHIP | MAY_CHMOD | MAY_SET_TIMES)) {
+ if (want & MAY_APPEND)
+ mask |= ACE4_APPEND_DATA;
+ else if (want & MAY_DELETE_SELF)
+ mask |= ACE4_DELETE;
+ else if (want & MAY_TAKE_OWNERSHIP)
+ mask |= ACE4_WRITE_OWNER;
+ else if (want & MAY_CHMOD)
+ mask |= ACE4_WRITE_ACL;
+ else if (want & MAY_SET_TIMES)
+ mask |= ACE4_WRITE_ATTRIBUTES;
+ else {
+ if (want & MAY_CREATE_FILE)
+ mask |= ACE4_ADD_FILE;
+ if (want & MAY_CREATE_DIR)
+ mask |= ACE4_ADD_SUBDIRECTORY;
+ if (want & MAY_DELETE_CHILD)
+ mask |= ACE4_DELETE_CHILD;
+ }
+ } else if (want & MAY_WRITE)
+ mask |= ACE4_WRITE_DATA;
+ if (want & MAY_EXEC)
+ mask |= ACE4_EXECUTE;
+
+ return mask;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(richacl_want_to_mask);
+
+/**
* richace_is_same_identifier - are both identifiers the same?
*/
int
diff --git a/include/linux/richacl.h b/include/linux/richacl.h
index b0472f1..399dbc9 100644
--- a/include/linux/richacl.h
+++ b/include/linux/richacl.h
@@ -117,6 +117,49 @@ struct richacl {
ACE4_WRITE_OWNER | \
ACE4_SYNCHRONIZE)
+/*
+ * The POSIX permissions are supersets of the following NFSv4 permissions:
+ *
+ * - MAY_READ maps to READ_DATA or LIST_DIRECTORY, depending on the type
+ * of the file system object.
+ *
+ * - MAY_WRITE maps to WRITE_DATA or ACE4_APPEND_DATA for files, and to
+ * ADD_FILE, ACE4_ADD_SUBDIRECTORY, or ACE4_DELETE_CHILD for directories.
+ *
+ * - MAY_EXECUTE maps to ACE4_EXECUTE.
+ *
+ * (Some of these NFSv4 permissions have the same bit values.)
+ */
+#define ACE4_POSIX_MODE_READ ( \
+ ACE4_READ_DATA | \
+ ACE4_LIST_DIRECTORY)
+#define ACE4_POSIX_MODE_WRITE ( \
+ ACE4_WRITE_DATA | \
+ ACE4_ADD_FILE | \
+ ACE4_APPEND_DATA | \
+ ACE4_ADD_SUBDIRECTORY | \
+ ACE4_DELETE_CHILD)
+#define ACE4_POSIX_MODE_EXEC ACE4_EXECUTE
+#define ACE4_POSIX_MODE_ALL ( \
+ ACE4_POSIX_MODE_READ | \
+ ACE4_POSIX_MODE_WRITE | \
+ ACE4_POSIX_MODE_EXEC)
+/*
+ * These permissions are always allowed
+ * no matter what the acl says.
+ */
+#define ACE4_POSIX_ALWAYS_ALLOWED ( \
+ ACE4_SYNCHRONIZE | \
+ ACE4_READ_ATTRIBUTES | \
+ ACE4_READ_ACL)
+/*
+ * The owner is implicitly granted
+ * these permissions under POSIX.
+ */
+#define ACE4_POSIX_OWNER_ALLOWED ( \
+ ACE4_WRITE_ATTRIBUTES | \
+ ACE4_WRITE_OWNER | \
+ ACE4_WRITE_ACL)
/**
* richacl_get - grab another reference to a richacl handle
*/
@@ -241,5 +284,8 @@ extern struct richacl *richacl_alloc(int);
extern int richace_is_same_identifier(const struct richace *,
const struct richace *);
extern int richace_set_who(struct richace *, const char *);
+extern int richacl_masks_to_mode(const struct richacl *);
+extern unsigned int richacl_mode_to_mask(mode_t);
+extern unsigned int richacl_want_to_mask(int);
#endif /* __RICHACL_H */
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-23 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-23 13:51 [PATCH -V5 00/24] New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:51 ` [PATCH -V5 01/24] vfs: Indicate that the permission functions take all the MAY_* flags Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:51 ` [PATCH -V5 04/24] vfs: Add generic IS_ACL() test for acl support Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:51 ` [PATCH -V5 05/24] vfs: Add IS_RICHACL() test for richacl support Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:51 ` [PATCH -V5 06/24] vfs: Optimize out IS_RICHACL() if CONFIG_FS_RICHACL is not defined Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:51 ` [PATCH -V5 07/24] vfs: Add new file and directory create permission flags Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:51 ` [PATCH -V5 08/24] vfs: Add delete child and delete self " Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:51 ` [PATCH -V5 09/24] vfs: Make the inode passed to inode_change_ok non-const Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:51 ` [PATCH -V5 10/24] vfs: Add permission flags for setting file attributes Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:51 ` [PATCH -V5 11/24] vfs: Make acl_permission_check() work for richacls Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:51 ` [PATCH -V5 12/24] richacl: In-memory representation and helper functions Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:52 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2011-02-23 13:52 ` [PATCH -V5 16/24] richacl: Permission check algorithm Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:52 ` [PATCH -V5 17/24] richacl: Create-time inheritance Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:52 ` [PATCH -V5 18/24] richacl: Check if an acl is equivalent to a file mode Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:52 ` [PATCH -V5 19/24] richacl: Automatic Inheritance Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:52 ` [PATCH -V5 20/24] richacl: xattr mapping functions Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:52 ` [PATCH -V5 21/24] ext4: Use IS_POSIXACL() to check for POSIX ACL support Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:52 ` [PATCH -V5 22/24] vfs: Cache richacl in struct inode Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:52 ` [PATCH -V5 23/24] ext4: Implement rich acl for ext4 Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:52 ` [PATCH -V5 24/24] ext4: Add temporary richacl mount option " Aneesh Kumar K.V
[not found] ` <1298469131-16555-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-23 13:51 ` [PATCH -V5 02/24] vfs: Pass all mask flags down to iop->check_acl Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:51 ` [PATCH -V5 03/24] vfs: Add a comment to inode_permission() Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:52 ` [PATCH -V5 14/24] richacl: Compute maximum file masks from an acl Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-23 13:52 ` [PATCH -V5 15/24] richacl: Update the file masks in chmod() Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-02-28 21:11 ` [PATCH -V5 00/24] New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability Ted Ts'o
2011-03-01 6:50 ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2011-03-02 15:49 ` J. Bruce Fields
[not found] ` <20110302154943.GB29136-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2011-03-02 17:47 ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
[not found] ` <87ei6pza5v.fsf-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2011-03-02 18:58 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-04 10:38 ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2011-03-05 0:32 ` J. Bruce Fields
[not found] ` <20110305003214.GF21260-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2011-03-05 17:58 ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2011-03-15 8:46 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2011-05-11 22:16 ` Björn JACKE
[not found] ` <E1QKJAl-00DGc7-EB@intern.SerNet.DE>
2011-05-13 15:40 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1298469131-16555-14-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=agruen@linbit.com \
--cc=agruen@suse.de \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=dilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=sfrench@us.ibm.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).