From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Subject: Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM TOPIC] Writeback - current state and future
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 16:07:20 -0500
Message-ID: <1298754440.2459.116.camel@mulgrave.site>
References: <20110204164222.GG4104@quack.suse.cz>
	 <4D4E7B48.9020500@panasas.com> <op.vqhlw3rirwwil4@sfaibish1.corp.emc.com>
	 <20110211144717.GH5187@quack.suse.cz>
	 <op.vqqyfgtmunckof@usensfaibisl2e.eng.emc.com>
	 <op.vri3gqaxrwwil4@sfaibish1.corp.emc.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, lsf-pc@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
To: Sorin Faibish <sfaibish@emc.com>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([66.63.167.143]:49860 "EHLO
	bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751417Ab1BZVHY (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 26 Feb 2011 16:07:24 -0500
In-Reply-To: <op.vri3gqaxrwwil4@sfaibish1.corp.emc.com>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 16:03 -0500, Sorin Faibish wrote:
> It looks like people in LSF are not so interested in writeback problems
> and we will not have a discussion on this. Too bad as I have new results
> to present regarding the latest patches in the kernel related to writeback
> and I am not sure for the best.

I'm not entirely sure how you arrive at this conclusion.  The programme
isn't decided yet, but I'd be pretty certain there'll be another plenary
session on writeback given the interest.

James