From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>, xfs <xfs@oss.sgi.com>,
jack <jack@suse.cz>, axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
dchinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: buffered writeback torture program
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 13:34:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1303407205-sup-6141@think> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110421083258.GA26784@infradead.org>
Excerpts from Christoph Hellwig's message of 2011-04-21 04:32:58 -0400:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 02:23:29PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> But given that you are able to reproduce it, does the following patch
> help your latencies? Currently XFS actually does stop I/O when
> nr_to_write reaches zero, but only for non-blocking I/O. This behaviour
> was introduced in commit efceab1d563153a2b1a6e7d35376241a48126989
>
> "xfs: handle negative wbc->nr_to_write during sync writeback"
>
> and works around issues in the generic writeback code.
>
>
> Index: linux-2.6/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c 2011-04-21 10:20:48.303550404 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c 2011-04-21 10:20:58.203496773 +0200
> @@ -765,8 +765,7 @@ xfs_convert_page(
> SetPageUptodate(page);
>
> if (count) {
> - if (--wbc->nr_to_write <= 0 &&
> - wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE)
> + if (--wbc->nr_to_write <= 0)
> done = 1;
> }
> xfs_start_page_writeback(page, !page_dirty, count);
Sorry, this doesn't do it. I think that given what a strange special
case this is, we're best off waiting for the IO-less throttling, and
maybe changing the code in xfs/ext4 to be a little more seek aware. Or
maybe not, it has to get written eventually either way.
-chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-21 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-20 18:23 buffered writeback torture program Chris Mason
2011-04-20 22:06 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-21 11:09 ` Chris Mason
2011-04-21 15:25 ` Chris Mason
2011-04-21 15:35 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-04-21 16:55 ` Jan Kara
2011-04-21 16:57 ` Chris Mason
2011-04-21 20:44 ` Jan Kara
2011-04-21 8:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-21 17:34 ` Chris Mason [this message]
2011-04-21 17:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-21 17:59 ` Andreas Dilger
2011-04-21 18:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-21 18:02 ` Chris Mason
2011-04-21 18:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-21 18:29 ` Chris Mason
2011-04-21 18:43 ` Andreas Dilger
2011-04-21 18:47 ` Chris Mason
2011-04-21 18:00 ` Chris Mason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1303407205-sup-6141@think \
--to=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).