linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
To: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
Cc: viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, hch@lst.de,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/18] gfs2: remove unnecessary dentry_unhash on rmdir/rename_dir
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 09:45:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1305017115.2839.2.camel@menhir> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1305002616-16782-18-git-send-email-sage@newdream.net>

Hi,

On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 21:43 -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
> Gfs2 has no issues with lingering references to unlinked directory
> inodes.
> 
> CC: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
> CC: cluster-devel@redhat.com
> Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
> ---
>  fs/gfs2/ops_inode.c |    5 -----
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/gfs2/ops_inode.c b/fs/gfs2/ops_inode.c
> index 4bf862c..09e436a 100644
> --- a/fs/gfs2/ops_inode.c
> +++ b/fs/gfs2/ops_inode.c
> @@ -572,8 +572,6 @@ static int gfs2_rmdir(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry)
>  	struct gfs2_holder ri_gh;
>  	int error;
>  
> -	dentry_unhash(dentry);
> -
>  	error = gfs2_rindex_hold(sdp, &ri_gh);
>  	if (error)
>  		return error;
> @@ -743,9 +741,6 @@ static int gfs2_rename(struct inode *odir, struct dentry *odentry,
>  	int error;
>  
>  	if (ndentry->d_inode) {
> -		if (S_ISDIR(ndentry->d_inode->i_mode))
> -			dentry_unhash(ndentry);
> -
>  		nip = GFS2_I(ndentry->d_inode);
>  		if (ip == nip)
>  			return 0;

I recently posted some patches to this area of code, and I was intending
to push them into my GFS2 -nmw tree today, so I wonder if you could
simplify this by not adding the dentry_unhash into gfs2 in the first
place, which would then ensure no conflicts between the two patch sets?

Steve.



  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-10  8:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-10  4:43 [PATCH 00/18] clean up VFS dentry_hash (mis)behavior Sage Weil
2011-05-10  4:43 ` [PATCH 01/18] vfs: dentry_unhash immediately prior to rmdir Sage Weil
2011-05-10  8:12   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-10  4:43 ` [PATCH 02/18] vfs: remove dget() from dentry_unhash() Sage Weil
2011-05-10  4:43 ` [PATCH 03/18] vfs: push dentry_unhash on rmdir into file systems Sage Weil
2011-05-10  4:43 ` [PATCH 04/18] vfs: push dentry_unhash on rename_dir " Sage Weil
2011-05-10  4:43 ` [PATCH 05/18] vfs: update dentry_unhash() comment Sage Weil
2011-05-10  4:43 ` [PATCH 06/18] libfs: drop unneeded dentry_unhash Sage Weil
2011-05-10  4:43 ` [PATCH 07/18] vfs: fix vfs_rename_dir for FS_RENAME_DOES_D_MOVE filesystems Sage Weil
2011-05-10  4:43 ` [PATCH 08/18] ceph: remove unnecessary dentry_unhash calls Sage Weil
2011-05-10  4:43 ` [PATCH 09/18] xfs: remove unnecessary dentry_unhash from rmdir/rename_dir Sage Weil
2011-05-10  4:43 ` [PATCH 10/18] btrfs: remove unnecessary dentry_unhash in rmdir/rename_dir Sage Weil
2011-05-10  4:43 ` [PATCH 11/18] ext4: remove unnecessary dentry_unhash on rmdir/rename_dir Sage Weil
2011-05-10  4:43 ` [PATCH 12/18] ext3: " Sage Weil
2011-05-10  4:43 ` [PATCH 13/18] ext2: " Sage Weil
     [not found] ` <1305002616-16782-1-git-send-email-sage-BnTBU8nroG7k1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-05-10  4:43   ` [PATCH 14/18] nfs: " Sage Weil
2011-05-10  4:43 ` [PATCH 15/18] exofs: " Sage Weil
2011-05-11 12:53   ` Boaz Harrosh
2011-05-10  4:43 ` [PATCH 16/18] ocfs2: " Sage Weil
2011-05-10 20:24   ` Joel Becker
2011-05-10  4:43 ` [PATCH 17/18] gfs2: " Sage Weil
2011-05-10  8:45   ` Steven Whitehouse [this message]
2011-05-10 15:47     ` Sage Weil
2011-05-10  4:43 ` [PATCH 18/18] cifs: " Sage Weil
2011-05-11 10:06 ` [PATCH 00/18] clean up VFS dentry_hash (mis)behavior Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-11 17:18   ` Sage Weil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1305017115.2839.2.camel@menhir \
    --to=swhiteho@redhat.com \
    --cc=cluster-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sage@newdream.net \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).