From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mimi Zohar Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/21] EVM Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 18:09:14 -0400 Message-ID: <1306188554.2732.73.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1305557115-15652-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20110520185034.GA8920@mail.hallyn.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, James Morris , David Safford , Andrew Morton , Greg KH , Dmitry Kasatkin To: "Serge E. Hallyn" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110520185034.GA8920@mail.hallyn.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 13:50 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Hi Mimi, > > just fyi I think I'm done with the patches where my reviews might be > useful. I'll give them another look-over when you repost. You said > something about ltp testcases - please let me know if you'd like any > help, otherwise if they're not yet upstream when you repost, please > point me to them, and i'll build a test kernel and exercise it > somewhere. > > thanks, > -serge Thanks so much Serge for all the reviews! In terms of the EVM ltp testcases, I have some tests, but they make a number of assumptions, like having an EVM key and a fully labeled system. After re-posting, I'll take a look into creating a set of EVM testcases, which don't require a fully labeled system. thanks, Mimi