* [PATCH] xfs: fix xfs_file_fsync() call in O_SYNC case
@ 2011-07-19 16:19 Josef Bacik
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Josef Bacik @ 2011-07-19 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: hch, viro, linux-fsdevel, david
When I pushed down the i_mutex into ->fsync() I created a deadlock with xfs when
writing O_SYNC. Fix this by dropping the filemap_write_and_wait_range() since
it's done in ->fsync() now and call xfs_file_fsync() where we've dropped the
i_mutex. This was suggested by Christoph and has passed xfstests. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
---
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_file.c | 11 ++---------
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_file.c
index 9183f75..1db8bd8 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_file.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_file.c
@@ -887,18 +887,11 @@ xfs_file_aio_write(
/* Handle various SYNC-type writes */
if ((file->f_flags & O_DSYNC) || IS_SYNC(inode)) {
loff_t end = pos + ret - 1;
- int error, error2;
xfs_rw_iunlock(ip, iolock);
- error = filemap_write_and_wait_range(mapping, pos, end);
+ ret = -xfs_file_fsync(file, pos, end,
+ (file->f_flags & __O_SYNC) ? 0 : 1);
xfs_rw_ilock(ip, iolock);
-
- error2 = -xfs_file_fsync(file, pos, end,
- (file->f_flags & __O_SYNC) ? 0 : 1);
- if (error)
- ret = error;
- else if (error2)
- ret = error2;
}
out_unlock:
--
1.7.5.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2011-07-19 16:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-07-19 16:19 [PATCH] xfs: fix xfs_file_fsync() call in O_SYNC case Josef Bacik
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).