From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Mackall Subject: Re: Nanosecond fs timestamp support: sad Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 16:11:42 -0500 Message-ID: <1311369102.14555.268.camel@calx> References: <1311271641.14555.114.camel@calx> <20110722163335.2df4f6ca@notabene.brown> <1311363269.14555.261.camel@calx> <20110722205922.GS8006@one.firstfloor.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: NeilBrown , linux-fsdevel , Linux Kernel Mailing List To: Andi Kleen Return-path: Received: from waste.org ([173.11.57.241]:56926 "EHLO waste.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932158Ab1GVVLq (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jul 2011 17:11:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110722205922.GS8006@one.firstfloor.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 22:59 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > Indeed. Only usefully exists on ext4 and requires extra system calls. > > Not sure what you mean? It's in stat(2), just like the timestamps. I don't see anything that looks like a version or generation number in either the man pages, the asm-generic/stat.h, or glibc's asm/stat.h. Pointer? The only interface I'm aware of is the EXT?_IOC_GETVERSION interface. Looks like that is supported by BTRFS. -- Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.