From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Curt Wohlgemuth <curtw@google.com>,
Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] vfs: Make sync(1) writeout also block device inodes
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:38:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1311719886-1130-2-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1311719886-1130-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz>
In case block device does not have filesystem mounted on it, sync(1) will just
ignore it and doesn't writeout dirty pages because it iterates over filesystems
with s_bdi != noop_backing_dev_info and thus it avoids blockdev_superblock.
Since it's unexpected that sync doesn't writeout dirty data for block devices
be nice to users and change the behavior to do so.
This requires a change to how syncing is done. We now first traverse all
superblocks with s_bdi != noop_backing_dev_info, writeout their inodes and
call sync_fs and when this is done, we traverse all block devices and sync
them.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
fs/sync.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/sync.c b/fs/sync.c
index c38ec16..f8f21d9 100644
--- a/fs/sync.c
+++ b/fs/sync.c
@@ -23,20 +23,13 @@
/*
* Do the filesystem syncing work. For simple filesystems
- * writeback_inodes_sb(sb) just dirties buffers with inodes so we have to
- * submit IO for these buffers via __sync_blockdev(). This also speeds up the
- * wait == 1 case since in that case write_inode() functions do
+ * writeback_inodes_sb(sb) just dirties buffers with inodes so the caller has
+ * to additionally submit IO for these buffers via __sync_blockdev(). This also
+ * speeds up the wait == 1 case since in that case write_inode() functions do
* sync_dirty_buffer() and thus effectively write one block at a time.
*/
-static int __sync_filesystem(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
+static void __sync_filesystem(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
{
- /*
- * This should be safe, as we require bdi backing to actually
- * write out data in the first place
- */
- if (sb->s_bdi == &noop_backing_dev_info)
- return 0;
-
if (sb->s_qcop && sb->s_qcop->quota_sync)
sb->s_qcop->quota_sync(sb, -1, wait);
@@ -47,7 +40,6 @@ static int __sync_filesystem(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
if (sb->s_op->sync_fs)
sb->s_op->sync_fs(sb, wait);
- return __sync_blockdev(sb->s_bdev, wait);
}
/*
@@ -71,16 +63,26 @@ int sync_filesystem(struct super_block *sb)
if (sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)
return 0;
- ret = __sync_filesystem(sb, 0);
+ /*
+ * This should be safe, as we require bdi backing to actually
+ * write out data in the first place.
+ */
+ if (sb->s_bdi == &noop_backing_dev_info)
+ return 0;
+
+ __sync_filesystem(sb, 0);
+ ret = __sync_blockdev(sb->s_bdev, 0);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
- return __sync_filesystem(sb, 1);
+ __sync_filesystem(sb, 1);
+ return __sync_blockdev(sb->s_bdev, 1);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sync_filesystem);
static void sync_one_sb(struct super_block *sb, void *arg)
{
- if (!(sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY))
+ /* Avoid read-only filesystems and filesystems without backing device */
+ if (!(sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY) && sb->s_bdi != &noop_backing_dev_info)
__sync_filesystem(sb, *(int *)arg);
}
/*
@@ -92,6 +94,42 @@ static void sync_filesystems(int wait)
iterate_supers(sync_one_sb, &wait);
}
+static void sync_all_bdevs(int wait)
+{
+ struct inode *inode, *old_inode = NULL;
+
+ spin_lock(&inode_sb_list_lock);
+ list_for_each_entry(inode, &blockdev_superblock->s_inodes, i_sb_list) {
+ struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping;
+
+ spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
+ if (inode->i_state & (I_FREEING|I_WILL_FREE|I_NEW) ||
+ mapping->nrpages == 0) {
+ spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
+ continue;
+ }
+ __iget(inode);
+ spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&inode_sb_list_lock);
+ /*
+ * We hold a reference to 'inode' so it couldn't have been
+ * removed from s_inodes list while we dropped the
+ * inode_sb_list_lock. We cannot iput the inode now as we can
+ * be holding the last reference and we cannot iput it under
+ * inode_sb_list_lock. So we keep the reference and iput it
+ * later.
+ */
+ iput(old_inode);
+ old_inode = inode;
+
+ __sync_blockdev(I_BDEV(inode), wait);
+
+ spin_lock(&inode_sb_list_lock);
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&inode_sb_list_lock);
+ iput(old_inode);
+}
+
/*
* sync everything. Start out by waking pdflush, because that writes back
* all queues in parallel.
@@ -101,6 +139,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE0(sync)
wakeup_flusher_threads(0);
sync_filesystems(0);
sync_filesystems(1);
+ sync_all_bdevs(0);
+ sync_all_bdevs(1);
if (unlikely(laptop_mode))
laptop_sync_completion();
return 0;
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-26 22:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-26 22:38 [PATCH 0/5 v2] Improve sync(2) handling Jan Kara
2011-07-26 22:38 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2011-07-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 1/5] vfs: Make sync(1) writeout also block device inodes Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-28 20:13 ` Jan Kara
2011-07-26 22:38 ` [PATCH 2/5] vfs: Move noop_backing_dev_info check from sync into writeback Jan Kara
2011-07-27 9:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-26 22:38 ` [PATCH 3/5] quota: Split dquot_quota_sync() to writeback and cache flushing part Jan Kara
2011-07-27 8:26 ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-07-27 9:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-26 22:38 ` [PATCH 4/5] quota: Move quota syncing to ->sync_fs method Jan Kara
2011-07-27 8:32 ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-07-27 9:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-27 13:44 ` Dave Kleikamp
2011-07-26 22:38 ` [PATCH 5/5] vfs: Avoid unnecessary WB_SYNC_NONE writeback during sync(1) Jan Kara
2011-07-27 9:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-28 17:42 ` Jan Kara
2011-07-28 20:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-28 21:20 ` Curt Wohlgemuth
2011-07-29 11:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-28 15:00 ` [PATCH 0/5 v2] Improve sync(2) handling Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-06 22:20 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1311719886-1130-2-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=curtw@google.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).