From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/18] writeback: per task dirty rate limit Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 09:31:56 +0200 Message-ID: <1315380716.11101.5.camel@twins> References: <20110904015305.367445271@intel.com> <20110904020915.240747479@intel.com> <1315324030.14232.14.camel@twins> <20110907010448.GA6513@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , Andrew Morton , Jan Kara , Christoph Hellwig , Dave Chinner , Greg Thelen , Minchan Kim , Vivek Goyal , Andrea Righi , linux-mm , LKML To: Wu Fengguang Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110907010448.GA6513@localhost> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 09:04 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > So the sqrt naturally leads to less overheads and more N tolerance for > large memory servers, which have large (thresh-freerun) gaps. Thanks, and as you say its an initial guess, later refined using patch 14. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org