From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Subject: Re: [2.6.39-rc1] LTP hitting max (8) nested links...
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 08:48:15 -0400
Message-ID: <131751.1301921295@localhost>
References: <BANLkTi=pS8Wk9Ymtj=DeVqfgqBsbTXDHZA@mail.gmail.com>
            <BANLkTi=Mu70wYSM0sVRWZnQzTPBOvqt6xg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1301921295_92930P";
	 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 04 Apr 2011 11:19:08 +0800."
             <BANLkTi=Mu70wYSM0sVRWZnQzTPBOvqt6xg@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

--==_Exmh_1301921295_92930P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 11:19:08 +0800, Daniel J Blueman said:

> Re-reading everything, nested here is actually recursively nested, not
> consecutively nested, so will never succeed, so we expect this from
> the LTP test.

We expect the LTP test to be handed an error, I suspect.  The LTP test
probably shouldn't be able to provoke a BUG_ON.

--==_Exmh_1301921295_92930P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001

iD8DBQFNmb4PcC3lWbTT17ARAo1hAKD8XBfHdnkWdisSWsn+m0TGX7+NwACgwpI7
8QepILms6E4gcQJ0FMKTFA8=
=5Fka
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--==_Exmh_1301921295_92930P--